X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-059-23229"

m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 37-059-23229
 
| Well ID: 37-059-23229
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="14" | {{#display_map: 39.887805, -80.361723 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 39.887805, -80.361723 | width=100% | height=100% }}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Country: United States
 
| Country: United States
Line 23: Line 23:
 
| Spud Date:  
 
| Spud Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
| Permit Date: 9/16/2002
+
| Permit Date: 2002-09-16
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Unconventional Well: N
 
| Unconventional Well: N
Line 49: Line 49:
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
 +
<!--== Fracking Activities ==
 +
==== Fracking Jobs ====
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | Job Number
 +
!scope="col" | Job Start Date
 +
!scope="col" | Job End Date
 +
!scope="col" | True Vertical Depth (ft)
 +
!scope="col" | Total Water Volume (gal)
 +
!scope="col" | Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
<!--==== Fluid Composition Data ====
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 +
!scope="col" | Job Number
 +
!scope="col" | Trade Name
 +
!scope="col" | Supplier
 +
!scope="col" | Purpose
 +
!scope="col" | Ingredient Name
 +
!scope="col" | CAS Number
 +
!scope="col" | Additive Percentage by Mass
 +
!scope="col" | Job Percentage by Mass
 +
!scope="col" | Mass Used (lb)
 +
|-
 +
|}-->
 +
 
<!--== Production Data ==
 
<!--== Production Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 84: Line 109:
 
| 1170784
 
| 1170784
 
| Primary Facility
 
| Primary Facility
| 09/24/2002
+
| 2002-09-24
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
Line 91: Line 116:
 
| 1178424
 
| 1178424
 
| Primary Facility
 
| Primary Facility
| 10/23/2002
+
| 2002-10-23
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
Line 98: Line 123:
 
| 1239490
 
| 1239490
 
| Primary Facility
 
| Primary Facility
| 05/29/2003
+
| 2003-05-29
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| Routine/Complete Inspection
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
Line 144: Line 169:
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
 
  | accessdate = 2019-05-21 }}</ref>
<!--== Fracking Activities ==
 
==== Fracking Jobs ====
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
!scope="col" | Job Number
 
!scope="col" | Job Start Date
 
!scope="col" | Job End Date
 
!scope="col" | True Vertical Depth (ft)
 
!scope="col" | Total Water Volume (gal)
 
!scope="col" | Total Non-Water Volume (gal)
 
|-
 
|}-->
 
<!--==== Fluid Composition Data ====
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
!scope="col" | Job Number
 
!scope="col" | Trade Name
 
!scope="col" | Supplier
 
!scope="col" | Purpose
 
!scope="col" | Ingredient Name
 
!scope="col" | CAS Number
 
!scope="col" | Additive Percentage by Mass
 
!scope="col" | Job Percentage by Mass
 
!scope="col" | Mass Used (lb)
 
|-
 
|}-->
 
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Pennsylvania Wells]]
 
[[Category:Pennsylvania Wells]]

Revision as of 04:13, 26 July 2019

Well Details

Well ID: 37-059-23229
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Greene
Municipality: Center Township
Operator Name: PENNECO OIL CO INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: CHARLES NELSON 2
License Status:
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 2002-09-16
Unconventional Well: N
Configuration: Vertical Well
Latitude: 39.887805
Longitude: -80.361723

For data sources see[1][2][3]


Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
1170784 Primary Facility 2002-09-24 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Long upgrade access is culverted, ditched, stoned & graded. Bench has excavated, pit dug, site awaiting rig. Trees are stacked & trimmed. High hilltop loc. near high tension line. Well rocked access.
1178424 Primary Facility 2002-10-23 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Well is awaiting development, staked only, pits cut, awaits rig, access is constructed. Bench excavation is completed.
1239490 Primary Facility 2003-05-29 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted Walked up the access.. Gated at bottom, past loc. # 059-23158, and 059-23211, this being used as a borrow pit for access work. #23236 is a cut bench , not yet drilled, as is also, Nelson #2. The accesses are stable, gated at pastures and await development.
2696991 Primary Facility 2018-02-14 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted On Wednesday, February 14, 2018, I conducted a routine-complete inspection at the Charles Nelson 2 well site which is located in Center Township, Greene County. The Charles Nelson 2 Well is located on the same pad as the Charles Nelson 3H Oil Well. The Oil &Gas Mapping Site identifies the well as an active vertical gas well which has reported production for the previous years, although information within the mobile SAIR application used to produce this report identifies the well as, operator reported never drilled, which is obviously not the case. There was another well which was permitted for this site, The Charles Nelson 4H, which was proposed and never materialized (PBNM). It is assumed that the well numbers were inadvertently entered incorrectly.

The access road and the well pad were in good condition and the site has been stabilized with vegetation.

There was no secondary containment around the production tank which appeared to be in good condition with no signs of deterioration on the tank or sig

For data sources see[4]

References