37-063-36267

Well Details

Well ID: 37-063-36267	Loading map... {"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.876333,"lon":-79.170019,"icon":""}]}
Operator Name: XTO ENERGY INC
First Permit Date: 2009-03-24
Last Permit Date: 2009-03-24
Spud Date: 2009-05-26
Unconventional: No
Horizontal: No
Violations: None
Latitude: 40.876333
Longitude: -79.170019

Production Data

PERIOD	GAS QUANTITY	GAS PRODUCTION DAYS	CONDENSATE QUANTITY	CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS	OIL QUANTITY	OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2013-0	3232.0	365.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2012-0	3682.0	362.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2011-0	3812.0	298.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2010-0	5629.0	347.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2009-0	5319.0	365.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Waste Data

PERIOD	TYPE	QUANTITY	UNITS	DISPOSAL METHOD	WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID	WASTE FACILITY NAME	FACILITY CITY	FACILITY STATE

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID	DATE	DESCRIPTION	COMMENT	VIOLATION ID
1802271	2009-05-28	No Violations Noted	Well being drilled at time of inspection. Site ID sign in place. E&S plan on site. Access road was stable with no signs of accelerated erosion. Site was stable with no signs of accelerated erosion on site. BMP's were in place in accordance with E&S plan and were well maintained. Lined pit appeared sound, and had adequate freeboard. Access road entrance requires additional rock, and a sweeper truck may be necessary due to a large amount of mud being carried out onto Windows road from the access road. E&S plan states the project will include the construction of +/- 1400 feet of access road. Actual distance of road constructed was +/- 2500 feet. Please change this in the E&S plan. Please address these concerns and contact this office upon completion.
1804582	2009-06-09	No Violations Noted	Site ID sign in place. E&S plan on site. Well not equipped for production (well head only on site). Access road stable with no signs of accelerated erosion. Site stable with no signs of accelerated erosion on site. BMP's in place in accordance with E&S plan and well maintained. Lined pit appeared sound, and had adequate freeboard. Additional rock has been applied to the access road entrance. Appropriate changes were made to the E&S plan in relation to the access road. The above changes were requested through compliance assistance in an inspection report dated 5/28/09. Site is now in compliance.
1812217	2009-06-23	No Violations Noted	Site ID sign in place. E&S plan on site. Well not equipped for production (well head only on site). Access road stable with no signs of accelerated erosion. Access road entrance stabilized with rock. BMP's in place in accordance with E&S plan and well maintained. Pits have been back-filled, and site regraded to contour. Site has been seeded and mulched. No violations found.
2098192	2012-08-21	No Violations Noted	Inspection on request of operator. Operator received a complaint regarding access road and wanted department thoughts on condition of access road. Access road is gated. Initial access road entrance is shared to homeowners driveway, minor rutting exhibited department recommended that operator add additional rock to minimize rutting. Access road leading to well site(s) appears stable, again some minor rutting that operator agreed to add rock. No accelerated erosion or sedimentation issues note don well site or access road. Complainant has not yet filed a formal complaint with department, at this time operator received complaint and is trying to address as appropriate. Operator agreed to documents "changes" via photographs. No violations noted at the time of thin inspection.