If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%" | ||
| Well ID: 37-051-00118 | | Well ID: 37-051-00118 | ||
| − | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan=" | + | | style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 39.91975, -79.849944 | width=100% | height=100% }} |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | County: [[Fayette County, Pennsylvania|Fayette]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Municipality: [[German Township, Fayette County, Pennsylvania|German Township]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Operator Name: [[THE PRODUCTION CO LLC]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Well Pad ID: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Farm/Lease Name: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| First Permit Date: 1856-08-15 | | First Permit Date: 1856-08-15 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 24: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Horizontal: No | | Horizontal: No | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Well Status: ACTIVE | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Violations: 6 | | Violations: 6 | ||
| Line 32: | Line 44: | ||
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | !scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 1991-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 2325.0 |
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 364.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1996-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 1921.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1996-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1997-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1998-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 30.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1999-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2003-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 2648.87 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 41: | Line 107: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2004-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 3315.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 50: | Line 116: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2005-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 1972.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 59: | Line 125: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2007-0 |
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 1043.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2008-0 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:right;" | 550.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 77: | Line 152: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2010-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 86: | Line 161: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2011-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 12.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 95: | Line 170: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2012-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 12.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 104: | Line 179: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2013-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 12.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 113: | Line 188: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | 2014-0 |
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 12.0 |
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 365.0 | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | | style="text-align:right;" | 0.0 | ||
| Line 122: | Line 197: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
| + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Production Report | ||
| + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | ||
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref> | ||
== Waste Data == | == Waste Data == | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | ||
| Line 134: | Line 215: | ||
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE | !scope="col" | FACILITY STATE | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web | ||
| + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report | ||
| + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | ||
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Waste | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-26 }}</ref> | ||
== Inspection Data == | == Inspection Data == | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | {| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%" | ||
| Line 141: | Line 228: | ||
!scope="col" | COMMENT | !scope="col" | COMMENT | ||
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | !scope="col" | VIOLATION ID | ||
| + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE | ||
| + | !scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1852514 | | 1852514 | ||
| Line 147: | Line 236: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578592 | | 578592 | ||
| + | | 105GEN - Encroachment-General | ||
| + | | No E&S control measures were in place where the pipeline crossed the stream. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 154: | Line 245: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578592 | | 578592 | ||
| + | | 105GEN - Encroachment-General | ||
| + | | No E&S control measures were in place where the pipeline crossed the stream. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 161: | Line 254: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578593 | | 578593 | ||
| + | | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | ||
| + | | No stabilization measures were taken on the cleared pipeline area to prevent erosion. There were not any erosion and sedimentation (﾿E&S﾿) control measures where the new pipeline crossed a creek. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 168: | Line 263: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578593 | | 578593 | ||
| + | | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | ||
| + | | No stabilization measures were taken on the cleared pipeline area to prevent erosion. There were not any erosion and sedimentation (﾿E&S﾿) control measures where the new pipeline crossed a creek. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 175: | Line 272: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578594 | | 578594 | ||
| + | | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | ||
| + | | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 182: | Line 281: | ||
| | | | ||
| 578594 | | 578594 | ||
| + | | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | ||
| + | | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 187: | Line 288: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580130 | | 580130 | ||
| + | | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | ||
| + | | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 194: | Line 297: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580130 | | 580130 | ||
| + | | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | ||
| + | | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 201: | Line 306: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580130 | | 580130 | ||
| + | | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | ||
| + | | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 208: | Line 315: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580131 | | 580131 | ||
| + | | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | ||
| + | | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 215: | Line 324: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580131 | | 580131 | ||
| + | | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | ||
| + | | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 222: | Line 333: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580131 | | 580131 | ||
| + | | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | ||
| + | | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 229: | Line 342: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580132 | | 580132 | ||
| + | | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | ||
| + | | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 236: | Line 351: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580132 | | 580132 | ||
| + | | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | ||
| + | | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 243: | Line 360: | ||
| 2010-01-20 | | 2010-01-20 | ||
| Violation(s) Noted | | Violation(s) Noted | ||
| − | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the | + | | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. |
| 580132 | | 580132 | ||
| + | | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | ||
| + | | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 251: | Line 370: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. | | Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 258: | Line 379: | ||
| No Violations Noted | | No Violations Noted | ||
| Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. | | Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ==References== | + | For data sources see<ref>{{cite web |
| − | {{ | + | | title = Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report |
| − | + | | publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]] | |
| + | | date = 2015-05-26 | ||
| + | | url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspections | ||
| + | | accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref> | ||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
[[Category:Wells]] | [[Category:Wells]] | ||
| Well ID: 37-051-00118 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":39.91975,"lon":-79.849944,"icon":""}]} |
| County: Fayette | |
| Municipality: German Township | |
| Operator Name: THE PRODUCTION CO LLC | |
| Well Pad ID: | |
| Farm/Lease Name: | |
| First Permit Date: 1856-08-15 | |
| Last Permit Date: 1856-08-15 | |
| Spud Date: 1800-01-01 | |
| Unconventional: No | |
| Horizontal: No | |
| Well Status: ACTIVE | |
| Violations: 6 | |
| Latitude: 39.91975 | |
| Longitude: -79.849944 |
| PERIOD | GAS QUANTITY | GAS PRODUCTION DAYS | CONDENSATE QUANTITY | CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS | OIL QUANTITY | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991-0 | 2325.0 | 364.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1996-0 | 1921.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1996-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1997-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1998-0 | 30.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1999-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2003-0 | 2648.87 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004-0 | 3315.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005-0 | 1972.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2007-0 | 1043.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008-0 | 550.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009-0 | 182.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010-0 | 0.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011-0 | 12.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012-0 | 12.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013-0 | 12.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2014-0 | 12.0 | 365.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
For data sources see[1]
| PERIOD | TYPE | QUANTITY | UNITS | DISPOSAL METHOD | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID | WASTE FACILITY NAME | FACILITY CITY | FACILITY STATE |
|---|
For data sources see[2]
| INSPECTION ID | DATE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | VIOLATION ID | VIOLATION CODE | VIOLATION_COMMENT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578592 | 105GEN - Encroachment-General | No E&S control measures were in place where the pipeline crossed the stream. | |
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578592 | 105GEN - Encroachment-General | No E&S control measures were in place where the pipeline crossed the stream. | |
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578593 | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | No stabilization measures were taken on the cleared pipeline area to prevent erosion. There were not any erosion and sedimentation (﾿E&S﾿) control measures where the new pipeline crossed a creek. | |
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578593 | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | No stabilization measures were taken on the cleared pipeline area to prevent erosion. There were not any erosion and sedimentation (﾿E&S﾿) control measures where the new pipeline crossed a creek. | |
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578594 | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site. | |
| 1852514 | 2009-12-16 | Violation(s) Noted | 578594 | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site. | |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580130 | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580130 | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580130 | 102.4 - Failure to minimize accelerated erosion, implement E&S plan, maintain E&S controls. Failure to stabilize site until total site restoration under OGA Sec 206(c)(d) | Accelerated erosion and sedimentation occurred and was transported off the site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580131 | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580131 | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580131 | 102.4INADPLN - E&S Plan not adequate | Best management control measures were not adequate for the well site. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580132 | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580132 | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. |
| 1858651 | 2010-01-20 | Violation(s) Noted | On January 20, 2010, I conducted a routine inspection at the site to see if E&S control measures were installed. The E&S BMPs that were installed entailed staked hay bales that were not entrenched into the ground as called for in the DEP﾿s Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual. As a result, the run off that occurred from the previous rain/snow melt event undermined the hay bales. It was evident that a large amount of sediment left the site. The road side trenches were filled with mud and the farm fields across the streets had mud conveyed across them via the culverts under Ralf-New Salem Road and Shimpko Hollow Road. It was apparent that some of the sediment transported off site at the Shimpko Hollow Road pipeline crossing went into an unnamed tributary to Dunlap Creek. An E&S control plan for the pipeline project was not available on site to review. | 580132 | 102.4NOPLAN - No E&S plan developed, plan not on site | No E&S control plan for the project was available on the work site for review. |
| 1864936 | 2010-01-20 | No Violations Noted | Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. | |||
| 1864965 | 2010-02-03 | No Violations Noted | Inspection related to the gas line replacement that this well is attached to. |
For data sources see[3]