X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-005-30178"

m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 37-005-30178
 
| Well ID: 37-005-30178
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="14" | {{#display_map: 40.682281, -79.643638 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.682281, -79.643638 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 +
|-
 +
| County: [[Armstrong County, Pennsylvania|Armstrong]]
 +
|-
 +
| Municipality: [[Gilpin Township, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania|Gilpin Township]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Operator Name: [[VERNARD L SHUMAKER]]
 
| Operator Name: [[VERNARD L SHUMAKER]]
 +
|-
 +
| Well Pad ID:
 +
|-
 +
| Farm/Lease Name: SPRANKLE 2
 
|-
 
|-
 
| First Permit Date: 2008-12-22
 
| First Permit Date: 2008-12-22
Line 17: Line 25:
 
| Horizontal: No
 
| Horizontal: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: None
+
| Well Status: ACTIVE
 +
|-
 +
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Latitude: 40.682281
 
| Latitude: 40.682281
Line 33: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2009-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 6704.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2010-0
 
| 2010-0
Line 43: Line 62:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 2009-0
+
| 2012-0
−
| style="text-align:right;" | 6704.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 6048.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3984.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3688.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
Line 52: Line 89:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Production Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
 
== Waste Data ==
 
== Waste Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 69: Line 112:
 
| Bbl
 
| Bbl
 
| BRINE OR INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT PLT
 
| BRINE OR INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT PLT
−
|  
+
| PA0091472
−
| TUNNELTON
+
| TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY
−
|  
+
| SALTSBURG
−
|  
+
| PA
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Waste
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-26 }}</ref>
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 82: Line 131:
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1818677
 
| 1818677
Line 87: Line 138:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| Drilling appeared to have been completed and the operator had just finished running 4 1/2 inch casing in the well.  Noted no acclerated erosion & sedimentation in relation to the well-site or access road at the time of the inspection.  Observed that the access road area had the possibility of developing erosion issues should a rain event occur.  This was due to the lack of rock and/or broad based dips or some other BMP to move water off the access road.  In addition WQS Higgins recommended that the operator implemented additional access road BMP's along with seeding and mulching the sides of the access road to minimize the amount of exposed disturbed ar
 
| Drilling appeared to have been completed and the operator had just finished running 4 1/2 inch casing in the well.  Noted no acclerated erosion & sedimentation in relation to the well-site or access road at the time of the inspection.  Observed that the access road area had the possibility of developing erosion issues should a rain event occur.  This was due to the lack of rock and/or broad based dips or some other BMP to move water off the access road.  In addition WQS Higgins recommended that the operator implemented additional access road BMP's along with seeding and mulching the sides of the access road to minimize the amount of exposed disturbed ar
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 94: Line 147:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production.  Site had been regraded, seeded, mulched and the vegetation had begun to grow.  Operator should continue to monitor the site to insure that the 70% uniform coverage criteria is achieved.  Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria.
 
| Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production.  Site had been regraded, seeded, mulched and the vegetation had begun to grow.  Operator should continue to monitor the site to insure that the 70% uniform coverage criteria is achieved.  Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 101: Line 156:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production.  Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria.  No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site.  Noted several areas near the site that required reseeded & mulching.
 
| Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production.  Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria.  No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site.  Noted several areas near the site that required reseeded & mulching.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 108: Line 165:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| Well appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection.  There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation observed in relation to the site or access road.
 
| Well appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection.  There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation observed in relation to the site or access road.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
==References==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{{Reflist}}
+
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report
−
 
+
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspections
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 20:17, 26 June 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 37-005-30178
Loading map...
County: Armstrong
Municipality: Gilpin Township
Operator Name: VERNARD L SHUMAKER
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: SPRANKLE 2
First Permit Date: 2008-12-22
Last Permit Date: 2008-12-22
Spud Date: 2009-07-31
Unconventional: No
Horizontal: No
Well Status: ACTIVE
Violations: 0
Latitude: 40.682281
Longitude: -79.643638

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2009-0 6704.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2010-0 19062.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2012-0 6048.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2013-0 3984.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-0 3688.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2009-0 DRILLING 510.0 Bbl BRINE OR INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT PLT PA0091472 TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY SALTSBURG PA

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
1818677 2009-08-07 No Violations Noted Drilling appeared to have been completed and the operator had just finished running 4 1/2 inch casing in the well. Noted no acclerated erosion & sedimentation in relation to the well-site or access road at the time of the inspection. Observed that the access road area had the possibility of developing erosion issues should a rain event occur. This was due to the lack of rock and/or broad based dips or some other BMP to move water off the access road. In addition WQS Higgins recommended that the operator implemented additional access road BMP's along with seeding and mulching the sides of the access road to minimize the amount of exposed disturbed ar
1832469 2009-10-02 No Violations Noted Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production. Site had been regraded, seeded, mulched and the vegetation had begun to grow. Operator should continue to monitor the site to insure that the 70% uniform coverage criteria is achieved. Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria.
1899380 2010-07-20 No Violations Noted Drilling had been completed at the time of the inspection & the well appeared to be equipped for production. Access road had been top dressed with clean durable rock and the sides had vegetation growing that appeared to meet the 70% uniform coverage criteria. No accelerated erosion & sedimentation was observed in relation to the access road or well-site. Noted several areas near the site that required reseeded & mulching.
2253515 2014-03-14 No Violations Noted Well appeared to be equipped for production at the time of the inspection. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation observed in relation to the site or access road.

For data sources see[3]

References

  1. ↑ "Oil and Gas Historical Production Report". Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2015-05-26. Retrieved 2015-05-27. 
  2. ↑ "Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report". Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2015-05-26. Retrieved 2015-05-26. 
  3. ↑ "Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report". Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. 2015-05-26. Retrieved 2015-05-27. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki.org/index.php?title=37-005-30178&oldid=3846372"