X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-133-22600"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-133-22600
 
| Well ID: 34-133-22600
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.0566910946, -81.0094658077 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.05669109, -81.00946581 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Portage County, Ohio|Portage]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[ENERVEST OPERATING L]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 1982-04-21
 
| Spud Date: 1982-04-21
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Producing
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 3
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 41.0566910946
+
| Latitude: 41.05669109
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -81.0094658077
+
| Longitude: -81.00946581
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 1984-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 3487.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 78.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1985-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 2754.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 590.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1986-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1418.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 481.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1987-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1772.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 379.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1988-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1852.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 351.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1989-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 998.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 391.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1990-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 887.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 368.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1991-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1018.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 298.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1992-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1338.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 339.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1993-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1214.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 301.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1994-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1056.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 286.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1995-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 936.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 243.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1996-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 1119.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 250.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1997-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 961.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 225.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1998-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1999-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 684.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 203.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2000-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 659.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 91.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2001-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 768.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 702.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 110.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 646.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 201.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2005-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 782.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 201.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2006-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 568.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 112.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2007-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 626.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 122.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2008-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 641.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 168.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 657.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 158.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 702.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 205.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 689.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 157.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 650.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 94.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 497.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 94.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 319:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -1145837948
 
| -1145837948
 
| 2005-08-30
 
| 2005-08-30
−
|
+
|  
 
| Status check inspection - no violations at this time. It looks like there may have been a recent flowline repair on the east side of Mahoning, which still needs to be seeded.
 
| Status check inspection - no violations at this time. It looks like there may have been a recent flowline repair on the east side of Mahoning, which still needs to be seeded.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| -1149152918
 
| -1149152918
 
| 2013-05-07
 
| 2013-05-07
−
|
+
|  
 
| I was on location to do a follow-up inspection for complaint #4291 about a pin hole leak in the 210 barrel tank.  The tank had been repaired and the ground below the leak has been cleaned up properly.  This complaint is closed.  No violations.
 
| I was on location to do a follow-up inspection for complaint #4291 about a pin hole leak in the 210 barrel tank.  The tank had been repaired and the ground below the leak has been cleaned up properly.  This complaint is closed.  No violations.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -1632786698
 
−
| 2013-05-07
 
−
|
 
−
| I was on location to follow up on complaint ID#4291.  The pin hole leak had been fixed and the tank and ground had been cleaned up.  This complaint is closed.  No violations.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -312439901
 
−
| 2013-04-24
 
−
|
 
−
| I was on location to follow up on complaint #4291 filed on 4/23/13 about a pin hole leak in a production tank.  I met with the landowner, Dan Flick, and inspected the tank battery.  The battery contained a horizontal separator, a meter run, 1-210 barrel stock tank, and a 50 barrel poly tank.  The battery was diked and the proper ID was posted on the 210 barrel.  There was a small pin hole leak at a weld in the 210 barrel tank four feet off the ground.  Leakage was minimal and a small amount of oil had reached the ground inside the dike.  I called Kyle Ahbel (Enervest) and told him they need to fix the pin hole in the tank and clean up any oil on the ground.  He told me they would have a truck out tomorrow to empty the tank and they would get it fixed.  I inspected the wellhead and pumping unit.  The pumping unit was electric and was fenced and diked.  ID was posted on the fence.  No violations.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1286545842
 
| 1286545842
 
| 2010-09-28
 
| 2010-09-28
−
|
+
|  
 
| I received a call from the landowner at 2481 Mahoning Road reporting that the brine tank leaked and the power lines to the pumping unit were sagging. This inspection found that the bring tank had been overfilled but the loss appeared to be minimal. The power lines were sagging and I called Woody McDaniel with Enervest and requested that the line be pulled higher.
 
| I received a call from the landowner at 2481 Mahoning Road reporting that the brine tank leaked and the power lines to the pumping unit were sagging. This inspection found that the bring tank had been overfilled but the loss appeared to be minimal. The power lines were sagging and I called Woody McDaniel with Enervest and requested that the line be pulled higher.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1402942437
 
| 1402942437
 
| 2014-05-21
 
| 2014-05-21
−
|
+
|  
 
| I was on location at the request of the landowner to inspect the tank battery.  The 210 barrel tank had 2 pinhole leaks.  The first one, I had Enervest fix last year and is beginning to leak again.  The second, is on a welded seam below the first one and shows staining on the tank down to the ground.  An absorbent pad was on the ground at the tank base to soak up the leaking product.  Also, the connection to the poly tank is damaged and the gasket between the tank and the flange is broken in half and not in place.  The landowner showed me the drainage path from the tank battery area towards his house to the east.  An area of scattered, standing water, roughly 40' long through his yard had an oily sheen on top of it.  I confirmed it was oil with an absorbent pad and with my fingers.  Recent, heavy rain has mobilized residual oil inside the tank battery.  The inabiblity of the dike to contain spills and releases inside the battery is apparent based on the presence of sheen 150' down slope of the tanks and the lack of any standing water within the battery.  The height of the dike walls does not meet SPCC requirements and the southeast corner contains soil cracks that will allow the passage of liquids.  Enervest Operating LLC will, within one week,  repair or replace the 210 barrel tank, repair the connection on the poly tank, and rebuild the tank battery dike with good clay soil to the proper height to meet SPCC requirements.
 
| I was on location at the request of the landowner to inspect the tank battery.  The 210 barrel tank had 2 pinhole leaks.  The first one, I had Enervest fix last year and is beginning to leak again.  The second, is on a welded seam below the first one and shows staining on the tank down to the ground.  An absorbent pad was on the ground at the tank base to soak up the leaking product.  Also, the connection to the poly tank is damaged and the gasket between the tank and the flange is broken in half and not in place.  The landowner showed me the drainage path from the tank battery area towards his house to the east.  An area of scattered, standing water, roughly 40' long through his yard had an oily sheen on top of it.  I confirmed it was oil with an absorbent pad and with my fingers.  Recent, heavy rain has mobilized residual oil inside the tank battery.  The inabiblity of the dike to contain spills and releases inside the battery is apparent based on the presence of sheen 150' down slope of the tanks and the lack of any standing water within the battery.  The height of the dike walls does not meet SPCC requirements and the southeast corner contains soil cracks that will allow the passage of liquids.  Enervest Operating LLC will, within one week,  repair or replace the 210 barrel tank, repair the connection on the poly tank, and rebuild the tank battery dike with good clay soil to the proper height to meet SPCC requirements.
−
|
+
|  
−
| 9-1-07
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1402942437
+
| 1406809820
−
| 2014-05-21
+
| 2014-07-30
−
|
+
|  
−
| I was on location at the request of the landowner to inspect the tank battery.  The 210 barrel tank had 2 pinhole leaks.  The first one, I had Enervest fix last year and is beginning to leak again.  The second, is on a welded seam below the first one and shows staining on the tank down to the ground.  An absorbent pad was on the ground at the tank base to soak up the leaking product.  Also, the connection to the poly tank is damaged and the gasket between the tank and the flange is broken in half and not in place.  The landowner showed me the drainage path from the tank battery area towards his house to the east. An area of scattered, standing water, roughly 40' long through his yard had an oily sheen on top of it.  I confirmed it was oil with an absorbent pad and with my fingers.  Recent, heavy rain has mobilized residual oil inside the tank battery.  The inabiblity of the dike to contain spills and releases inside the battery is apparent based on the presence of sheen 150' down slope of the tanks and the lack of any standing water within the battery. The height of the dike walls does not meet SPCC requirements and the southeast corner contains soil cracks that will allow the passage of liquids.   Enervest Operating LLC will, within one week, repair or replace the 210 barrel tank, repair the connection on the poly tank, and rebuild the tank battery dike with good clay soil to the proper height to meet SPCC requirements.
+
| I was on location to follow up on compliance notice #1402942437.  Scott Fleishman (Enervest) informed me that the required work was completed on 6/27/14.  My inspection today found that the pinholes in the 210 barrel tank have been repaired and the dike around the tank battery has been rebuilt measuring 40'(L) x 12'(W) x 3'(H) and exceeds SPCC requirements for containing the 260 barrel capacity of the battery.  The gasket on the flow line to the 50 barrel poly has also been repaired.  The dike is currently holding water within the containment and there is no observable sheen on the water.  A small dike has also been constructed around the wellhead at the pumping unit.  The compliance issues at this well and tank battery have been resolved.  No violations.
−
|
+
|
−
| NONE(B)
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1415893044
 +
| 2014-09-10
 +
|
 +
| I received a phone call from Wendy Booth from our Uniontown Office that she received a call from Dan Flick stating that the Well Tender for Enervest was releasing fluid from the tank battery which was holding water inside the diked area and it was running on to his property. He stated that the lease road needs repaired. The lease road is passable for a water trucks and other well maintenance equipment.  Upon my inspection I could see where there was a trail of water that ran down the lease road but it did not appear to get on his property. When I tested the water at the tank battery is was very low ( fresh water ) Quan- tab showed very low. As for the lease road it does not appear to be on his property. I spoke with Joe Teppart Field Supervisor for Enervest about the lease road and also to stop draining the tank battery onto the lease road. Joe also stated that the lease road is not on his property. I tried to contact Mr. Flick but he has not returned my call. Complaint closed. Complaint number 4795.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1632786698
 +
| 2013-05-07
 +
|
 +
| I was on location to follow up on complaint ID#4291.  The pin hole leak had been fixed and the tank and ground had been cleaned up.  This complaint is closed.  No violations.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1402942437
+
| -312439901
−
| 2014-05-21
+
| 2013-04-24
−
|
+
|  
−
| I was on location at the request of the landowner to inspect the tank battery.  The 210 barrel tank had 2 pinhole leaks.  The first one, I had Enervest fix last year and is beginning to leak again.  The second, is on a welded seam below the first one and shows staining on the tank down to the ground.  An absorbent pad was on the ground at the tank base to soak up the leaking product.  Also, the connection to the poly tank is damaged and the gasket between the tank and the flange is broken in half and not in place.  The landowner showed me the drainage path from the tank battery area towards his house to the east.  An area of scattered, standing water, roughly 40' long through his yard had an oily sheen on top of it.  I confirmed it was oil with an absorbent pad and with my fingers.  Recent, heavy rain has mobilized residual oil inside the tank battery.  The inabiblity of the dike to contain spills and releases inside the battery is apparent based on the presence of sheen 150' down slope of the tanks and the lack of any standing water within the battery.  The height of the dike walls does not meet SPCC requirements and the southeast corner contains soil cracks that will allow the passage of liquids.   Enervest Operating LLC will, within one week, repair or replace the 210 barrel tank, repair the connection on the poly tank, and rebuild the tank battery dike with good clay soil to the proper height to meet SPCC requirements.
+
| I was on location to follow up on complaint #4291 filed on 4/23/13 about a pin hole leak in a production tank.  I met with the landowner, Dan Flick, and inspected the tank battery.  The battery contained a horizontal separator, a meter run, 1-210 barrel stock tank, and a 50 barrel poly tank.  The battery was diked and the proper ID was posted on the 210 barrel.  There was a small pin hole leak at a weld in the 210 barrel tank four feet off the ground.  Leakage was minimal and a small amount of oil had reached the ground inside the dike.  I called Kyle Ahbel (Enervest) and told him they need to fix the pin hole in the tank and clean up any oil on the ground.  He told me they would have a truck out tomorrow to empty the tank and they would get it fixed.  I inspected the wellhead and pumping unit.  The pumping unit was electric and was fenced and diked.  ID was posted on the fence.  No violations.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONE[C]
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 06:20, 15 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-133-22600
Loading map...
County: Portage
Municipality:
Operator Name: ENERVEST OPERATING L
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 1982-04-21
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Producing
Violations: 0
Latitude: 41.05669109
Longitude: -81.00946581

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
1984-0 3487.0 78.0
1985-0 2754.0 590.0
1986-0 1418.0 481.0
1987-0 1772.0 379.0
1988-0 1852.0 351.0
1989-0 998.0 391.0
1990-0 887.0 368.0
1991-0 1018.0 298.0
1992-0 1338.0 339.0
1993-0 1214.0 301.0
1994-0 1056.0 286.0
1995-0 936.0 243.0
1996-0 1119.0 250.0
1997-0 961.0 225.0
1998-0 0.0 0.0
1999-0 684.0 203.0
2000-0 659.0 91.0
2001-0 768.0 0.0
2003-0 702.0 110.0
2004-0 646.0 201.0
2005-0 782.0 201.0
2006-0 568.0 112.0
2007-0 626.0 122.0
2008-0 641.0 168.0
2010-0 657.0 158.0
2011-0 702.0 205.0
2012-0 689.0 157.0
2013-0 650.0 94.0
2014-0 497.0 365.0 94.0 365.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
-1145837948 2005-08-30 Status check inspection - no violations at this time. It looks like there may have been a recent flowline repair on the east side of Mahoning, which still needs to be seeded.
-1149152918 2013-05-07 I was on location to do a follow-up inspection for complaint #4291 about a pin hole leak in the 210 barrel tank. The tank had been repaired and the ground below the leak has been cleaned up properly. This complaint is closed. No violations.
1286545842 2010-09-28 I received a call from the landowner at 2481 Mahoning Road reporting that the brine tank leaked and the power lines to the pumping unit were sagging. This inspection found that the bring tank had been overfilled but the loss appeared to be minimal. The power lines were sagging and I called Woody McDaniel with Enervest and requested that the line be pulled higher.
1402942437 2014-05-21 I was on location at the request of the landowner to inspect the tank battery. The 210 barrel tank had 2 pinhole leaks. The first one, I had Enervest fix last year and is beginning to leak again. The second, is on a welded seam below the first one and shows staining on the tank down to the ground. An absorbent pad was on the ground at the tank base to soak up the leaking product. Also, the connection to the poly tank is damaged and the gasket between the tank and the flange is broken in half and not in place. The landowner showed me the drainage path from the tank battery area towards his house to the east. An area of scattered, standing water, roughly 40' long through his yard had an oily sheen on top of it. I confirmed it was oil with an absorbent pad and with my fingers. Recent, heavy rain has mobilized residual oil inside the tank battery. The inabiblity of the dike to contain spills and releases inside the battery is apparent based on the presence of sheen 150' down slope of the tanks and the lack of any standing water within the battery. The height of the dike walls does not meet SPCC requirements and the southeast corner contains soil cracks that will allow the passage of liquids. Enervest Operating LLC will, within one week, repair or replace the 210 barrel tank, repair the connection on the poly tank, and rebuild the tank battery dike with good clay soil to the proper height to meet SPCC requirements.
1406809820 2014-07-30 I was on location to follow up on compliance notice #1402942437. Scott Fleishman (Enervest) informed me that the required work was completed on 6/27/14. My inspection today found that the pinholes in the 210 barrel tank have been repaired and the dike around the tank battery has been rebuilt measuring 40'(L) x 12'(W) x 3'(H) and exceeds SPCC requirements for containing the 260 barrel capacity of the battery. The gasket on the flow line to the 50 barrel poly has also been repaired. The dike is currently holding water within the containment and there is no observable sheen on the water. A small dike has also been constructed around the wellhead at the pumping unit. The compliance issues at this well and tank battery have been resolved. No violations.
1415893044 2014-09-10 I received a phone call from Wendy Booth from our Uniontown Office that she received a call from Dan Flick stating that the Well Tender for Enervest was releasing fluid from the tank battery which was holding water inside the diked area and it was running on to his property. He stated that the lease road needs repaired. The lease road is passable for a water trucks and other well maintenance equipment. Upon my inspection I could see where there was a trail of water that ran down the lease road but it did not appear to get on his property. When I tested the water at the tank battery is was very low ( fresh water ) Quan- tab showed very low. As for the lease road it does not appear to be on his property. I spoke with Joe Teppart Field Supervisor for Enervest about the lease road and also to stop draining the tank battery onto the lease road. Joe also stated that the lease road is not on his property. I tried to contact Mr. Flick but he has not returned my call. Complaint closed. Complaint number 4795.
-1632786698 2013-05-07 I was on location to follow up on complaint ID#4291. The pin hole leak had been fixed and the tank and ground had been cleaned up. This complaint is closed. No violations.
-312439901 2013-04-24 I was on location to follow up on complaint #4291 filed on 4/23/13 about a pin hole leak in a production tank. I met with the landowner, Dan Flick, and inspected the tank battery. The battery contained a horizontal separator, a meter run, 1-210 barrel stock tank, and a 50 barrel poly tank. The battery was diked and the proper ID was posted on the 210 barrel. There was a small pin hole leak at a weld in the 210 barrel tank four feet off the ground. Leakage was minimal and a small amount of oil had reached the ground inside the dike. I called Kyle Ahbel (Enervest) and told him they need to fix the pin hole in the tank and clean up any oil on the ground. He told me they would have a truck out tomorrow to empty the tank and they would get it fixed. I inspected the wellhead and pumping unit. The pumping unit was electric and was fenced and diked. ID was posted on the fence. No violations.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-133-22600&oldid=4033074"