X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-089-21378"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-089-21378
 
| Well ID: 34-089-21378
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.1340054629, -82.2475729392 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.13381247, -82.24805102 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Licking County, Ohio|Licking]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[BABCOCK RONALD W]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 1956-03-22
 
| Spud Date: 1956-03-22
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Producing
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 4
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 40.1340054629
+
| Latitude: 40.13381247
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -82.2475729392
+
| Longitude: -82.24805102
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2002-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 115.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2003-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 81.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2004-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 50.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2005-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 104.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2006-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 70.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2007-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 60.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2008-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 72.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 62.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 14.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 27.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 34.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 34.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 51.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 166:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
−
|-
 
−
| 1343422531
 
−
| 2012-07-09
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field.  The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod).  The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike.  Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation.  The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs.  The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-.  At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank.  The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid.  No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations.  The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1343422531
 
−
| 2012-07-09
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field.  The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod).  The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike.  Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation.  The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs.  The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-.  At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank.  The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid.  No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations.  The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)10
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| 1343422531
 
−
| 2012-07-09
 
−
|
 
−
| An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field.  The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod).  The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike.  Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation.  The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs.  The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-.  At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank.  The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid.  No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations.  The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-9-05(A)9
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1343422531
 
| 1343422531
 
| 2012-07-09
 
| 2012-07-09
−
|
+
|  
 
| An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field.  The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod).  The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike.  Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation.  The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs.  The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-.  At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank.  The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid.  No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations.  The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
 
| An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area.  During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field.  The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod).  The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike.  Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation.  The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs.  The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-.  At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank.  The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid.  No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations.  The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
−
|
+
|  
−
| NONE(B)
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 294403099
 
| 294403099
 
| 2012-08-09
 
| 2012-08-09
−
|
+
|  
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed compliance.  The brine impacted soils were excavated and removed from the location.  The previously noted violations have been resolved.
 
| A follow-up inspection revealed compliance.  The brine impacted soils were excavated and removed from the location.  The previously noted violations have been resolved.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 00:25, 16 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-089-21378
Loading map...
County: Licking
Municipality:
Operator Name: BABCOCK RONALD W
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 1956-03-22
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Producing
Violations: 0
Latitude: 40.13381247
Longitude: -82.24805102

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2002-0 0.0 115.0
2003-0 0.0 81.0
2004-0 0.0 50.0
2005-0 0.0 104.0
2006-0 0.0 70.0
2007-0 0.0 60.0
2008-0 0.0 72.0
2010-0 0.0 62.0
2011-0 14.0 27.0
2012-0 0.0 34.0
2013-0 0.0 34.0
2014-0 0.0 365.0 51.0 365.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
1343422531 2012-07-09 An inspection of this well was conducted in response to an alleged water disruption within the area. During the inspection, it was noted that the well and tank battery were situated on a location designated as a pasture field. The well was equipped with a pumping unit and showed signs of recent production (i.e. Polish Rod). The shared tank battery with Permit No. 1525 consisted of (1) 100 bbl tank with no knockout tank and surrounded by an earthen dike. Below the earthen dike, an area the size of approximately 50' x 10' - 20' contained stressed vegetation. The soil was field tested with distilled water and High Range Quantabs. The quantabs showed 7.2 units, which equals 2839 ppm (mg/L) Cl-. At time of inspection, there were no visual leaks from the steel 100 bbl tank. The front section of earthen dike wall had eroded and could allow for the release of fluid. No identification was observed at the well or tank. GPS readings were obtained for the well and tank locations. The well owner was verbally informed of inspection results and all contaminated soils would be removed from the location.
294403099 2012-08-09 A follow-up inspection revealed compliance. The brine impacted soils were excavated and removed from the location. The previously noted violations have been resolved.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-089-21378&oldid=4180414"