X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "34-085-21289"

m
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 34-085-21289
 
| Well ID: 34-085-21289
−
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.6267019047, -81.4431169551 | width=100% | height=100% }}
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 41.6267019, -81.44311696 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| County:
+
| County: [[Lake County, Ohio|Lake]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Municipality:
+
| Municipality:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Operator Name:
+
| Operator Name: [[OSAIR INC]]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Well Pad ID:
+
| Well Pad ID:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Farm/Lease Name:
+
| Farm/Lease Name:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| First Permit Date:
+
| First Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Last Permit Date:
+
| Last Permit Date:  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Spud Date: 2010-02-27
 
| Spud Date: 2010-02-27
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Unconventional:
+
| Unconventional: No
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Horizontal:
+
| Configuration: Vertical
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Producing: No
+
| Well Status: Producing
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Violations: 1
+
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Latitude: 41.6267019047
+
| Latitude: 41.6267019
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Longitude: -81.4431169551
+
| Longitude: -81.44311696
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 43: Line 43:
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL QUANTITY
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 +
|-
 +
| 2010-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 364.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 357.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2012-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2013-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2014-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 63.0
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 63.0
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
== Waste Data ==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
−
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
+
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
−
!scope="col" | PERIOD
+
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
−
!scope="col" | TYPE
+
| date = 2015-06-19
−
!scope="col" | QUANTITY
+
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
−
!scope="col" | UNITS
+
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
−
!scope="col" | DISPOSAL METHOD
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID
 
−
!scope="col" | WASTE FACILITY NAME
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY CITY
 
−
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
−
|}
 
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 64: Line 103:
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
−
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
+
!scope="col" | VIOLATION COMMENT
−
|-
 
−
| -1953253916
 
−
| 2010-02-28
 
−
|
 
−
| The surface casing was installed and cemented.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -248895921
 
−
| 2010-02-27
 
−
|
 
−
| The conductor was installed and cemented.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
−
|-
 
−
| -399388341
 
−
| 2010-03-04
 
−
|
 
−
| The production casing was installed and cemented.
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|
 
−
|-
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 101339362
 
| 101339362
 
| 2012-03-30
 
| 2012-03-30
−
|
+
|  
−
| I was on site with DNR Supervisor Gene Chini.  I tested the water at the discharge of the culvert north/east of the wellhead for Chlorides with high range Quantabs. Readings were 0 PPM.  This is the location of the beige colored suspended material described in previous inspections.  The water level in the ditch has decreased since my last inspection.  An inspection of the ditch, up stream of the culvert, revealed this beige colored suspended material in the bottom of the stream.  The west bank of this ditch is concrete fill material.  This sediment appears to be fines from the fill material.  I collected soil samples, using a soil probe, west and northwest of the wellhead.  The test holes west of the wellhead indicated the soil was primarily clay.  Test holes to the northwest of the wellhead found the soil at the base of the hole was primarily clay with a silty clay in the top 12" of the hole.  Salt crystals were noted on the soil in front of the wellhead.
+
| I was on site with DNR Supervisor Gene Chini.  I tested the water at the discharge of the culvert north/east of the wellhead for Chlorides with high range Quantabs. Readings were 0 PPM.  This is the location of the beige colored suspended material described in previous inspections.  The water level in the ditch has decreased since my last inspection.  An inspection of the ditch, up stream of the culvert, revealed this beige colored suspended material in the bottom of the stream.  The west bank of this ditch is concrete fill material.  This sediment appears to be fines from the fill material.  I collected soil samples, using a soil probe, west and northwest of the wellhead.  The test holes west of the wellhead indicated the soil was primarily clay.  Test holes to the northwest of the wellhead found the soil at the base of the hole was primarily clay with a silty clay in the top 12 of the hole.  Salt crystals were noted on the soil in front of the wellhead.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
| Informal Letter
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1312555883
 
| 1312555883
 
| 2011-08-01
 
| 2011-08-01
−
|
+
|  
 
| Preliminary restoration passed
 
| Preliminary restoration passed
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1332358735
 
| 1332358735
 
| 2012-03-21
 
| 2012-03-21
−
|
+
|  
−
| I was on site today with DNR Inspectors Barry Grimm and Mark Moreland to drill one (1) control test hole and four (4) test soil borings on the former pit area, to determine the effectiveness of the solidification.  I tested the standing water on the pit area for chlorides (Cl) which were 187 PPM.  The GPS location of the water sample was at N41.62651, W081.44322. In addition to the Cl in the standing water, there is brine scalding on the soil on top of the former drill pit area and the vegetative coverage on this area is sparse.
+
| I was on site today with DNR Inspectors Barry Grimm and Mark Moreland to drill one (1) control test hole and four (4) test soil borings on the former pit area, to determine the effectiveness of the solidification.  I tested the standing water on the pit area for chlorides (Cl) which were 187 PPM.  The GPS location of the water sample was at N41.62651, W081.44322. In addition to the Cl in the standing water, there is brine scalding on the soil on top of the former drill pit area and the vegetative coverage on this area is sparse.
  
−
 
+
Test hole (TH) #1 was the control test hole and was located 52' south of the south west corner of the tank battery fence (GPS - N41.62618 W081.4429). Control samples were taken at depths of one foot and three feet. Both sample #1 (1
−
 
+
|  
−
TH #2 through TH #4 were drilled to four feet in depth.
+
|  
−
 
+
|  
−
TH #2 was drilled 62'10" southwest of the wellhead (GPS - N41.62656,  W081.44323).  The collected sample (#3) showed wet and poorly solidified drill cuttings, wet clay and wet solidification material.  This material was tested for Cl-1063 PPM.
 
−
 
 
−
TH #3 was drilled 48' 3" south west of the wellhead (GPS - N41.62659, W 81.44322).  Sample #4 consisted of damp silt/ clay with oxidized (red) sandstone.
 
−
TH #4 was drilled 41' 6" southwest of the wellhead (GPS - N41.62665, W081.44324). Soil sample #5, which was somewhat damp, consisted of silt/ clay with oxidized (red) sandstone and drill mud.
 
−
 
 
−
An attempt was made to drill TH #5 (GPS - N41.62669, W081.44323) but was unsuccessful due to coarse fill material. It appeared that the soil below the fill in TH #5 was hydric in nature.  The stream northeast of the wellhead was tested for Chlorides ? 232 PPM.  This sample was collected at: GPS - N041.62667, W081.44310.  A beige colored suspended material was present in the stream, which was tested with Phenolphthalein (1%).  Both the water and suspended material reacted with Phenolphthalein, turning pink.  Brine scalding around the wellhead location and the pit area was evident.  The brine scalding around the wellhead, was caused by a stuffing box leak, that has been repaired.  The former drill pits were constructed at an elevation of 652'.  The elevation increases to 670', 808' south of well location.  The permit did include Lake Plain Region conditions.  It is reasonable to believe that the pits, which are located in a lower area (wetlands) compared to the surrounding area, are being acted on by groundwater.  The force of the ground water may be causing the chlorides in the pit to move to the surface and be released into the environment.  The operator is to excavate the area of the former drill pits and add additional solidification material as needed.  Once the pits are sufficiently solidified they are to be remove and transported to an approved landfill in accordance with Ohio EPA regulations and guidelines.  The pit area is to be backfilled with clean fill material and re-graded.  In my previous inspection, on 03/13/2012, there were chlorides in the suspended blue-green material at the culvert discharge of over 1600 PPM.  Chlorides in the water discharging from the culvert were 233 PPM.  This area has received heavy rain between inspections.
 
−
|
 
−
| 9-1-07
 
−
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1332415985
 
| 1332415985
 
| 2012-03-21
 
| 2012-03-21
−
|
+
|  
−
| I arrived on site with DNR  Inspectors Grimm and Hill to collect samples. The location is in a wetlands. We completed a 360 * review of the site and found that there are cattails completely surrounding the location. There are two diversion swales that drain water away from the drilling site.  During our soil sampling of the drilling pit area, a Quantab was used to test Chlorides on the soil sample. The Chloride reading was over 1000 ppm.  After sampling was complete we were able to review the permit information. We found that the permit is a Lake Plains Region permit. As part of the permit conditons the pits should have been solidified and removed after drilling was completed. We met with the Great Plains field supervisor and advised him that there is brine contamination of the surface area in the vicinity of the former drilling  pit. We also advised him that there is Chloride contamination entering a drain tile and leaving the site. The Chloride range leaving the site was over 1800 ppm. We advised the field supervisor to excavate the drilling pits and remove any contaminated soil and dispose of it properly.  The drain tile also needs to be cleaned out and flushed.
+
| I arrived on site with DNR  Inspectors Grimm and Hill to collect samples. The location is in a wetlands. We completed a 360 * review of the site and found that there are cattails completely surrounding the location. There are two diversion swales that drain water away from the drilling site.  During our soil sampling of the drilling pit area, a Quantab was used to test Chlorides on the soil sample. The Chloride reading was over 1000 ppm.  After sampling was complete we were able to review the permit information. We found that the permit is a Lake Plains Region permit. As part of the permit conditons the pits should have been solidified and removed after drilling was completed. We met with the Great Plains field supervisor and advised him that there is brine contamination of the surface area in the vicinity of the former drilling  pit. We also advised him that there is Chloride contamination entering a drain tile and leaving the site. The Chloride range leaving the site was over 1800 ppm. We advised the field supervisor to excavate the drilling pits and remove any contaminated soil and dispose of it properly.  The drain tile also needs to be cleaned out and flushed.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1332432302
 
| 1332432302
 
| 2012-03-22
 
| 2012-03-22
−
|
+
|  
 
| I was on-site today to test the surface water, around the location, for chlorides.  The testing was conducted using Quan tabs from low range bottle #1137 (expiration date 2013/02) and high range bottle #1099 (expiration date 2013/03).  There are three drainage ditches around the location.  Ditch #1 is located west of the wellhead and flows south to north and then turns north east and flows under the location through a culvert, which is located approximately 10 yards north of the wellhead and discharges into Ditch #3.  This is the culvert that has the sediment issue at the east (discharge) end of it. Ditch #2 is located to the south of the tank battery and flows to the northeast into Ditch #3. Ditch #3 is located on the east side of the well head and tank battery and flows south to north.  Drainage direction was confirmed with Bright Byes Tablets.  A water sample was collected and tested from Ditch#1 discharge at GPS- N41.62606, W081.44359.  Chloride levels were 172 PPM.  Another water sample was collected at the culvert entrance to Ditch #1 at GPS- N41.62667, W081.44341.  Chloride levels were 158 PPM.  Drainage entering the ditches was clear.  A water sample was also collected at the intersection of Ditch #1 and #3 at Chlorides at the discharge of the culvert, intersection ditch #1 and ditch #3 at GPS- N41.62667 W081.44310.  Chloride levels were 765 PPM.                                                                                                                                                                                    On 03/21/2012 a water sample was tested at this same location and had chloride levels of 236 PPM. A water sample collected at the entrance to Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62621, W081.44313) had chloride levels of 0 PPM. A water sample was also collected at the discharge of the culvert of Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62625, W081.44306). Chloride levels were 28 PPM. None of the water in the ditches reacted with Phenolphthalein however, the beige colored suspended material at the discharge end of Ditch #1 did react with Phenolphthalein.  Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3, before Ditch #2 discharges into it (GPS-N41.62626, W081.442950), were zero ppm.  Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3 (GPS-N41.62662, W081.44300), just north of the discharge of Ditch #1, were 33 PPM.  The increase in Chloride levels at the intersection of Ditch #1 and Ditch #3 indicates continued leaching from the well location.  Remedial action must take place.
 
| I was on-site today to test the surface water, around the location, for chlorides.  The testing was conducted using Quan tabs from low range bottle #1137 (expiration date 2013/02) and high range bottle #1099 (expiration date 2013/03).  There are three drainage ditches around the location.  Ditch #1 is located west of the wellhead and flows south to north and then turns north east and flows under the location through a culvert, which is located approximately 10 yards north of the wellhead and discharges into Ditch #3.  This is the culvert that has the sediment issue at the east (discharge) end of it. Ditch #2 is located to the south of the tank battery and flows to the northeast into Ditch #3. Ditch #3 is located on the east side of the well head and tank battery and flows south to north.  Drainage direction was confirmed with Bright Byes Tablets.  A water sample was collected and tested from Ditch#1 discharge at GPS- N41.62606, W081.44359.  Chloride levels were 172 PPM.  Another water sample was collected at the culvert entrance to Ditch #1 at GPS- N41.62667, W081.44341.  Chloride levels were 158 PPM.  Drainage entering the ditches was clear.  A water sample was also collected at the intersection of Ditch #1 and #3 at Chlorides at the discharge of the culvert, intersection ditch #1 and ditch #3 at GPS- N41.62667 W081.44310.  Chloride levels were 765 PPM.                                                                                                                                                                                    On 03/21/2012 a water sample was tested at this same location and had chloride levels of 236 PPM. A water sample collected at the entrance to Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62621, W081.44313) had chloride levels of 0 PPM. A water sample was also collected at the discharge of the culvert of Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62625, W081.44306). Chloride levels were 28 PPM. None of the water in the ditches reacted with Phenolphthalein however, the beige colored suspended material at the discharge end of Ditch #1 did react with Phenolphthalein.  Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3, before Ditch #2 discharges into it (GPS-N41.62626, W081.442950), were zero ppm.  Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3 (GPS-N41.62662, W081.44300), just north of the discharge of Ditch #1, were 33 PPM.  The increase in Chloride levels at the intersection of Ditch #1 and Ditch #3 indicates continued leaching from the well location.  Remedial action must take place.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1333653886
 
| 1333653886
 
| 2012-04-05
 
| 2012-04-05
−
|
+
|  
 
| When I arrived onsite the operator was pulling vegetation blockages out of the drainage ditch that runs north/south on the east side of the location.  This material was stockpiled on location and I tested it for chlorides (1063 PPM).  The operator also excavated fill material away from the culvert until clean clay was encountered.  I tested the clear water, seeping out of the fill, for chlorides (1063 PPM).  This water was clear, with no visible drill mud.  I had the operator excavate a test hole (TH) west of the wellhead and 15' north of the pits (TH #1) which is at the interface of the fill and virgin soil.  Once the operator excavated below the fill, water began to seep in from the north. The soil to the south of the culvert was dry and dark brown in color.  I had the operator excavate a test trench 5'  north of the pits (TH #2,), to the same depth as TH #1.  The soil in TH #2 was tight, dry clay.  This trench was allowed to stand static and remained dry.  I had the operator excavate TH #3 in the north end of the former pit.  There was solidified material and shale cutting in this TH and it eventually filled with water.  The operator backfilled all test holes and the area around the culvert with clean fill.  The backfilled areas were seeded and fertilized at the time of inspection and silt fencing was installed.  I will continue to monitor this site.  If continued chloride leaching is detected, the material in the former pit will have to be removed and disposed of properly.
 
| When I arrived onsite the operator was pulling vegetation blockages out of the drainage ditch that runs north/south on the east side of the location.  This material was stockpiled on location and I tested it for chlorides (1063 PPM).  The operator also excavated fill material away from the culvert until clean clay was encountered.  I tested the clear water, seeping out of the fill, for chlorides (1063 PPM).  This water was clear, with no visible drill mud.  I had the operator excavate a test hole (TH) west of the wellhead and 15' north of the pits (TH #1) which is at the interface of the fill and virgin soil.  Once the operator excavated below the fill, water began to seep in from the north. The soil to the south of the culvert was dry and dark brown in color.  I had the operator excavate a test trench 5'  north of the pits (TH #2,), to the same depth as TH #1.  The soil in TH #2 was tight, dry clay.  This trench was allowed to stand static and remained dry.  I had the operator excavate TH #3 in the north end of the former pit.  There was solidified material and shale cutting in this TH and it eventually filled with water.  The operator backfilled all test holes and the area around the culvert with clean fill.  The backfilled areas were seeded and fertilized at the time of inspection and silt fencing was installed.  I will continue to monitor this site.  If continued chloride leaching is detected, the material in the former pit will have to be removed and disposed of properly.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1344355793
 
| 1344355793
 
| 2012-08-07
 
| 2012-08-07
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection today found the following: Pump unit well in good repair.  The man door to the tank battery did not have a lock on it, the operator will be contacted to install a lock on the man door.  Review of the drainage area showed that the precipitant
 
| My inspection today found the following: Pump unit well in good repair.  The man door to the tank battery did not have a lock on it, the operator will be contacted to install a lock on the man door.  Review of the drainage area showed that the precipitant
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 1423148635
 +
| 2015-02-05
 +
|
 +
| I inspected this well as part of routine inspection activity. My inspection found the following: Access to the well is via the former car dealer facility parking area. At the time of this inspection, there are 14+ inches of snow cover in the area. As such, access to the wellhead and battery are accessible by foot only. Production equipment has been removed from the wellhead. Only a closure swage and valve remain. The battery is idle. Connections are secure. Production records indicate the well has not produced since 2012.  I will follow up with Osair with regards to future plans to plug or produce the well.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -1953253916
 +
| 2010-02-28
 +
|
 +
| The surface casing was installed and cemented.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2079657305
 
| 2079657305
 
| 2010-10-19
 
| 2010-10-19
−
|
+
|  
 
| There were no violations at the time.
 
| There were no violations at the time.
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
−
|
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -248895921
 +
| 2010-02-27
 +
|
 +
| The conductor was installed and cemented.
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| -399388341
 +
| 2010-03-04
 +
|
 +
| The production casing was installed and cemented.
 +
|  
 +
|  
 +
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 893397594
 
| 893397594
 
| 2012-03-14
 
| 2012-03-14
−
|
+
|  
 
| My inspection of this well site found that the well has been converted from a plunger lift system to a pumping unit.  It appears that the stuffing box had leaked and there is a brine scald around the wellhead.  The stream to the north east of the well head has cream colored suspended solids in it. There are pools of what appears to be blue green algae growing in the water and there is Iron bacteria is evident.  The water and the solids separate when sample is taken.  I tested the chloride levels in a pool of the blue green material - > 1600 PPM.  I also tested the chloride levels at the discharge end of the culvert - < 233 PPM.  The water is clear entering the culvert but has the solids at the discharge end of the culvert.  Water samples were collected at the entrance and discharge end of the culvert and sent to our lab.
 
| My inspection of this well site found that the well has been converted from a plunger lift system to a pumping unit.  It appears that the stuffing box had leaked and there is a brine scald around the wellhead.  The stream to the north east of the well head has cream colored suspended solids in it. There are pools of what appears to be blue green algae growing in the water and there is Iron bacteria is evident.  The water and the solids separate when sample is taken.  I tested the chloride levels in a pool of the blue green material - > 1600 PPM.  I also tested the chloride levels at the discharge end of the culvert - < 233 PPM.  The water is clear entering the culvert but has the solids at the discharge end of the culvert.  Water samples were collected at the entrance and discharge end of the culvert and sent to our lab.
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
−
|
+
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS
 +
| publisher = [http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov/]
 +
| date = 2015-06-19
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Ohio_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspection
 +
| accessdate = 2015-06-20 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 06:12, 16 July 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 34-085-21289
Loading map...
County: Lake
Municipality:
Operator Name: OSAIR INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name:
First Permit Date:
Last Permit Date:
Spud Date: 2010-02-27
Unconventional: No
Configuration: Vertical
Well Status: Producing
Violations: 0
Latitude: 41.6267019
Longitude: -81.44311696

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2010-0 364.0 0.0
2011-0 357.0 0.0
2012-0 0.0 0.0
2013-0 0.0 0.0
2014-0 0.0 63.0 0.0 63.0

For data sources see[1]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION COMMENT
101339362 2012-03-30 I was on site with DNR Supervisor Gene Chini. I tested the water at the discharge of the culvert north/east of the wellhead for Chlorides with high range Quantabs. Readings were 0 PPM. This is the location of the beige colored suspended material described in previous inspections. The water level in the ditch has decreased since my last inspection. An inspection of the ditch, up stream of the culvert, revealed this beige colored suspended material in the bottom of the stream. The west bank of this ditch is concrete fill material. This sediment appears to be fines from the fill material. I collected soil samples, using a soil probe, west and northwest of the wellhead. The test holes west of the wellhead indicated the soil was primarily clay. Test holes to the northwest of the wellhead found the soil at the base of the hole was primarily clay with a silty clay in the top 12 of the hole. Salt crystals were noted on the soil in front of the wellhead. Informal Letter
1312555883 2011-08-01 Preliminary restoration passed
1332358735 2012-03-21 I was on site today with DNR Inspectors Barry Grimm and Mark Moreland to drill one (1) control test hole and four (4) test soil borings on the former pit area, to determine the effectiveness of the solidification. I tested the standing water on the pit area for chlorides (Cl) which were 187 PPM. The GPS location of the water sample was at N41.62651, W081.44322. In addition to the Cl in the standing water, there is brine scalding on the soil on top of the former drill pit area and the vegetative coverage on this area is sparse.

Test hole (TH) #1 was the control test hole and was located 52' south of the south west corner of the tank battery fence (GPS - N41.62618 W081.4429). Control samples were taken at depths of one foot and three feet. Both sample #1 (1

1332415985 2012-03-21 I arrived on site with DNR Inspectors Grimm and Hill to collect samples. The location is in a wetlands. We completed a 360 * review of the site and found that there are cattails completely surrounding the location. There are two diversion swales that drain water away from the drilling site. During our soil sampling of the drilling pit area, a Quantab was used to test Chlorides on the soil sample. The Chloride reading was over 1000 ppm. After sampling was complete we were able to review the permit information. We found that the permit is a Lake Plains Region permit. As part of the permit conditons the pits should have been solidified and removed after drilling was completed. We met with the Great Plains field supervisor and advised him that there is brine contamination of the surface area in the vicinity of the former drilling pit. We also advised him that there is Chloride contamination entering a drain tile and leaving the site. The Chloride range leaving the site was over 1800 ppm. We advised the field supervisor to excavate the drilling pits and remove any contaminated soil and dispose of it properly. The drain tile also needs to be cleaned out and flushed.
1332432302 2012-03-22 I was on-site today to test the surface water, around the location, for chlorides. The testing was conducted using Quan tabs from low range bottle #1137 (expiration date 2013/02) and high range bottle #1099 (expiration date 2013/03). There are three drainage ditches around the location. Ditch #1 is located west of the wellhead and flows south to north and then turns north east and flows under the location through a culvert, which is located approximately 10 yards north of the wellhead and discharges into Ditch #3. This is the culvert that has the sediment issue at the east (discharge) end of it. Ditch #2 is located to the south of the tank battery and flows to the northeast into Ditch #3. Ditch #3 is located on the east side of the well head and tank battery and flows south to north. Drainage direction was confirmed with Bright Byes Tablets. A water sample was collected and tested from Ditch#1 discharge at GPS- N41.62606, W081.44359. Chloride levels were 172 PPM. Another water sample was collected at the culvert entrance to Ditch #1 at GPS- N41.62667, W081.44341. Chloride levels were 158 PPM. Drainage entering the ditches was clear. A water sample was also collected at the intersection of Ditch #1 and #3 at Chlorides at the discharge of the culvert, intersection ditch #1 and ditch #3 at GPS- N41.62667 W081.44310. Chloride levels were 765 PPM. On 03/21/2012 a water sample was tested at this same location and had chloride levels of 236 PPM. A water sample collected at the entrance to Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62621, W081.44313) had chloride levels of 0 PPM. A water sample was also collected at the discharge of the culvert of Ditch #2 (GPS- N41.62625, W081.44306). Chloride levels were 28 PPM. None of the water in the ditches reacted with Phenolphthalein however, the beige colored suspended material at the discharge end of Ditch #1 did react with Phenolphthalein. Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3, before Ditch #2 discharges into it (GPS-N41.62626, W081.442950), were zero ppm. Chlorides in the water sample collected from Ditch #3 (GPS-N41.62662, W081.44300), just north of the discharge of Ditch #1, were 33 PPM. The increase in Chloride levels at the intersection of Ditch #1 and Ditch #3 indicates continued leaching from the well location. Remedial action must take place.
1333653886 2012-04-05 When I arrived onsite the operator was pulling vegetation blockages out of the drainage ditch that runs north/south on the east side of the location. This material was stockpiled on location and I tested it for chlorides (1063 PPM). The operator also excavated fill material away from the culvert until clean clay was encountered. I tested the clear water, seeping out of the fill, for chlorides (1063 PPM). This water was clear, with no visible drill mud. I had the operator excavate a test hole (TH) west of the wellhead and 15' north of the pits (TH #1) which is at the interface of the fill and virgin soil. Once the operator excavated below the fill, water began to seep in from the north. The soil to the south of the culvert was dry and dark brown in color. I had the operator excavate a test trench 5' north of the pits (TH #2,), to the same depth as TH #1. The soil in TH #2 was tight, dry clay. This trench was allowed to stand static and remained dry. I had the operator excavate TH #3 in the north end of the former pit. There was solidified material and shale cutting in this TH and it eventually filled with water. The operator backfilled all test holes and the area around the culvert with clean fill. The backfilled areas were seeded and fertilized at the time of inspection and silt fencing was installed. I will continue to monitor this site. If continued chloride leaching is detected, the material in the former pit will have to be removed and disposed of properly.
1344355793 2012-08-07 My inspection today found the following: Pump unit well in good repair. The man door to the tank battery did not have a lock on it, the operator will be contacted to install a lock on the man door. Review of the drainage area showed that the precipitant
1423148635 2015-02-05 I inspected this well as part of routine inspection activity. My inspection found the following: Access to the well is via the former car dealer facility parking area. At the time of this inspection, there are 14+ inches of snow cover in the area. As such, access to the wellhead and battery are accessible by foot only. Production equipment has been removed from the wellhead. Only a closure swage and valve remain. The battery is idle. Connections are secure. Production records indicate the well has not produced since 2012. I will follow up with Osair with regards to future plans to plug or produce the well.
-1953253916 2010-02-28 The surface casing was installed and cemented.
2079657305 2010-10-19 There were no violations at the time.
-248895921 2010-02-27 The conductor was installed and cemented.
-399388341 2010-03-04 The production casing was installed and cemented.
893397594 2012-03-14 My inspection of this well site found that the well has been converted from a plunger lift system to a pumping unit. It appears that the stuffing box had leaked and there is a brine scald around the wellhead. The stream to the north east of the well head has cream colored suspended solids in it. There are pools of what appears to be blue green algae growing in the water and there is Iron bacteria is evident. The water and the solids separate when sample is taken. I tested the chloride levels in a pool of the blue green material - > 1600 PPM. I also tested the chloride levels at the discharge end of the culvert - < 233 PPM. The water is clear entering the culvert but has the solids at the discharge end of the culvert. Water samples were collected at the entrance and discharge end of the culvert and sent to our lab.

For data sources see[2]

References

  1. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [1]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
  2. ↑ "Ohio Department of Natural Resources RBDMS". [2]. 2015-06-19. Retrieved 2015-06-20. 
Retrieved from "https://wellwiki.org/index.php?title=34-085-21289&oldid=4235308"