X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

Difference between revisions of "37-003-22162"

m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable welldetails" width="95%"
 
| Well ID: 37-003-22162
 
| Well ID: 37-003-22162
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="14" | {{#display_map: 40.494963, -79.770722 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
+
| style="height=100%; align=center" rowspan="15" | {{#display_map: 40.494963, -79.770722 | width=100% | height=100% }}  
 +
|-
 +
| County: [[Allegheny County, Pennsylvania|Allegheny]]
 +
|-
 +
| Municipality: [[Plum Borough, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania|Plum Borough]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Operator Name: [[PENNECO OIL CO INC]]
 
| Operator Name: [[PENNECO OIL CO INC]]
 +
|-
 +
| Well Pad ID:
 +
|-
 +
| Farm/Lease Name: KUHN 6
 
|-
 
|-
 
| First Permit Date: 2011-01-26
 
| First Permit Date: 2011-01-26
Line 17: Line 25:
 
| Horizontal: No
 
| Horizontal: No
 
|-
 
|-
| Violations: None
+
| Well Status: ACTIVE
 +
|-
 +
| Violations: 0
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Latitude: 40.494963
 
| Latitude: 40.494963
Line 34: Line 44:
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
!scope="col" | OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
 
|-
 
|-
| 2013-0
+
| 2010-0
| style="text-align:right;" | 563.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
| 2011-0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 391.0
 +
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
| style="text-align:right;" | 77.26
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 75.57
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
Line 52: Line 71:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
| 2011-0
+
| 2013-0
| style="text-align:right;" | 391.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 563.0
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
| style="text-align:right;" | 75.57
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 77.26
| style="text-align:right;" | 61.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
| 2010-0
+
| 2014-0
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 334.0
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 365.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 0.0
Line 70: Line 89:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Production Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Production
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
 
== Waste Data ==
 
== Waste Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 82: Line 107:
 
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
!scope="col" | FACILITY STATE
 
|-
 
|-
| 2012-0
+
| 2011-0
| PRODUCED FLUID
+
| FRACING FLUID WASTE
| style="text-align:right;" | 1273.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 869.05
 
| Bbl
 
| Bbl
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
| PA0101508
+
| PA0091472
| PA BRINE TRT INC - FRANKLIN PLT - VENANGO CO
+
| TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY
| FRANKLIN
+
| SALTSBURG
 
| PA
 
| PA
 
|-
 
|-
Line 99: Line 124:
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| PA0101508
 
| PA0101508
| PA BRINE TRT INC - FRANKLIN PLT - VENANGO CO
+
| FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY
 
| FRANKLIN
 
| FRANKLIN
| PA
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2011-0
 
| FRACING FLUID WASTE
 
| style="text-align:right;" | 869.05
 
| Bbl
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| PA0091472
 
| TUNNELTON LIQUIDS COMPANY
 
| SALTSBURG
 
 
| PA
 
| PA
 
|-
 
|-
Line 117: Line 131:
 
| 2012-0
 
| 2012-0
 
| PRODUCED FLUID
 
| PRODUCED FLUID
| style="text-align:right;" | 1273.0
+
| style="text-align:right;" | 1.0
 
| Bbl
 
| Bbl
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE
 
| PA0101508
 
| PA0101508
| PA BRINE TRT INC - FRANKLIN PLT - VENANGO CO
+
| FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY
 
| FRANKLIN
 
| FRANKLIN
 
| PA
 
| PA
Line 137: Line 151:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
 +
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Waste Report
 +
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Waste
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-26 }}</ref>
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
== Inspection Data ==
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" width="95%"
Line 144: Line 164:
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | COMMENT
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 
!scope="col" | VIOLATION ID
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION CODE
 +
!scope="col" | VIOLATION_COMMENT
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1974612
 
| 1974612
Line 150: Line 172:
 
| RIG IS DOWN FOR CEMENT TIME.
 
| RIG IS DOWN FOR CEMENT TIME.
 
SITE, PIT, E&S, AND ACCESS, OK.
 
SITE, PIT, E&S, AND ACCESS, OK.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 158: Line 182:
 
| DRILLING COMPLETE. SITE IS CLEAN. ACCESS IS STONED.
 
| DRILLING COMPLETE. SITE IS CLEAN. ACCESS IS STONED.
 
WELL IS NOT FRACED.
 
WELL IS NOT FRACED.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 165: Line 191:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| On April 28th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling has started.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit appeared to be in good condition and had adequate freeboard.  Cementing was taking place.  Water trucks were on site removing water from the pit.  No accelerated erosion was observed at the time of inspection.
 
| On April 28th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling has started.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit appeared to be in good condition and had adequate freeboard.  Cementing was taking place.  Water trucks were on site removing water from the pit.  No accelerated erosion was observed at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 172: Line 200:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| On May 3rd, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 
| On May 3rd, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 179: Line 209:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| On May 19th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard.  Water trucks were on site.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 
| On May 19th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard.  Water trucks were on site.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 186: Line 218:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| On July 6th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The well was being equipped for production.  Two tanks were in place surrounded by a dike.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit was closed and the site was rough graded but not yet seeded or mulched.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 
| On July 6th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection.  Drilling was complete.  The well was being equipped for production.  Two tanks were in place surrounded by a dike.  The access road was in good condition.  A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite.  E&S controls were in place.  The pit was closed and the site was rough graded but not yet seeded or mulched.  No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 193: Line 227:
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| No Violations Noted
 
| At the time of the inspection, the well site sign and label were on site.  The well was drilled and equipped for production. The associated well apparatus located onsite appeared to be in sound working condition.  There were no erosion or sedimentation issues.  The area around the pad was restored and meets the 70% uniform vegetative coverage.
 
| At the time of the inspection, the well site sign and label were on site.  The well was drilled and equipped for production. The associated well apparatus located onsite appeared to be in sound working condition.  There were no erosion or sedimentation issues.  The area around the pad was restored and meets the 70% uniform vegetative coverage.
 +
|
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
==References==
+
For data sources see<ref>{{cite web
{{Reflist}}
+
| title = Oil and Gas Historical Inspection Report
 
+
| publisher = [[Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection]]
 +
| date = 2015-05-26
 +
| url = http://wellwiki.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Oil_and_Gas_Data_Sources#Inspections
 +
| accessdate = 2015-05-27 }}</ref>
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
[[Category:Wells]]
 
[[Category:Wells]]

Revision as of 03:08, 25 June 2015

Well Details

Well ID: 37-003-22162
Loading map...
County: Allegheny
Municipality: Plum Borough
Operator Name: PENNECO OIL CO INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: KUHN 6
First Permit Date: 2011-01-26
Last Permit Date: 2011-01-26
Spud Date: 2011-04-25
Unconventional: No
Horizontal: No
Well Status: ACTIVE
Violations: 0
Latitude: 40.494963
Longitude: -79.770722

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2010-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2011-0 391.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 75.57 61.0
2012-0 1146.0 366.0 0.0 0.0 186.68 366.0
2013-0 563.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 77.26 365.0
2014-0 334.0 365.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2011-0 FRACING FLUID WASTE 869.05 Bbl CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE PA0091472 TUNNELTON LIQUIDS TREATMENT FACILITY SALTSBURG PA
2011-0 PRODUCED FLUID 285.0 Bbl CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE PA0101508 FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY FRANKLIN PA
2012-0 PRODUCED FLUID 1.0 Bbl CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE PA0101508 FLUID RECOVERY SERVICE FRANKLIN FACILITY FRANKLIN PA
2013-0 PRODUCED FLUID 342.0 Bbl CENT WASTE TRT FAC NPDES DISCHARGE PA0095443 CREEKSIDE TREATMENT FACILITY CREEKSIDE PA

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
1974612 2011-04-28 No Violations Noted RIG IS DOWN FOR CEMENT TIME.

SITE, PIT, E&S, AND ACCESS, OK.

1976519 2011-05-03 No Violations Noted DRILLING COMPLETE. SITE IS CLEAN. ACCESS IS STONED.

WELL IS NOT FRACED.

1983745 2011-04-28 No Violations Noted On April 28th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection. Drilling has started. The access road was in good condition. A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite. E&S controls were in place. The pit appeared to be in good condition and had adequate freeboard. Cementing was taking place. Water trucks were on site removing water from the pit. No accelerated erosion was observed at the time of inspection.
1983778 2011-05-03 No Violations Noted On May 3rd, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection. Drilling was complete. The access road was in good condition. A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite. E&S controls were in place. The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard. No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
1984205 2011-05-19 No Violations Noted On May 19th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection. Drilling was complete. The access road was in good condition. A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite. E&S controls were in place. The pit contained fluid but had adequate freeboard. Water trucks were on site. No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
1992022 2011-07-06 No Violations Noted On July 6th, 2011 I visited this site as a routine inspection. Drilling was complete. The well was being equipped for production. Two tanks were in place surrounded by a dike. The access road was in good condition. A Site ID and E&S plan were posted onsite. E&S controls were in place. The pit was closed and the site was rough graded but not yet seeded or mulched. No accelerated erosion, spills, or leaks were observed at the time of inspection.
2107697 2012-10-15 No Violations Noted At the time of the inspection, the well site sign and label were on site. The well was drilled and equipped for production. The associated well apparatus located onsite appeared to be in sound working condition. There were no erosion or sedimentation issues. The area around the pad was restored and meets the 70% uniform vegetative coverage.

For data sources see[3]

References