X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-005-20578

Well Details

Well ID: 37-005-20578
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Pennsylvania
County: Armstrong
Municipality: Burrell Township
Operator Name: BAKER GAS INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: JOHN CASSIMATIS 3
License Status: PLUGGED & ABANDONED
Spud Date:
Permit Date: 1963-03-29
Well Type: GAS
Unconventional Well: N
Configuration: Vertical Well
Conservation: No
Latitude: 40.656524
Longitude: -79.489076

For data sources see[1][2][3]

Well History

Date Event
1941-01-01 Drilling Completion
1963-03-29 New Permit Application
1965-01-01 REWORKED
2012-08-30 Drilling Completion
2013-02-28 FULLY PLUGGED

For data sources see[4]


Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Gas Production Days Oil Quantity (bbl) Oil Production Days Water Quantity (bbl) Water Production Days
1996 1506.85 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
1997 1289.08 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
1998 1168.38 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
1999 1656.25 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2000 1422.64 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2001 1256.08 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2002 995.38 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2003 920.77 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2004 828.38 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2005 902.62 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2006 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2007 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2008 853.77 366 0.00 0 0.00 0
2009 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
2010 515.85 301 0.00 0 0.00 0
2011 473.92 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2012 1,063.00 366 0.00 0 0.00 0
2013 631.46 365 0.00 0 0.00 0
2014 497.00 365 0.00 0 0.00 0

For data sources see[5]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Category Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
2073875 Primary Facility 2012-06-05 Routine/Complete Inspection No Violations Noted shut in on 2"
2190226 Primary Facility 2013-07-10 Site Restoration No Violations Noted Well site restoration appeared to have been completed. Vegetative cover met the 70% uniform coverage criteria and there was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation. Monument verification was not possible due to the fact that the monument was buried.

For data sources see[6]

References