X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

37-005-31173

Well Details

Well ID: 37-005-31173
Loading map...
County: Armstrong
Municipality: Gilpin Township
Operator Name: MDS ENERGY DEV LLC
Well Pad ID: 150288
Farm/Lease Name: RALPH MYERS ETUX 1M-35
First Permit Date: 2013-10-11
Last Permit Date: 2013-10-11
Spud Date: 2013-12-04
Unconventional: Yes
Horizontal: No
Well Status: ACTIVE
Violations: 0
Latitude: 40.679591
Longitude: -79.59053

Production Data

PERIOD GAS QUANTITY GAS PRODUCTION DAYS CONDENSATE QUANTITY CONDENSATE PRODUCTION DAYS OIL QUANTITY OIL PRODUCTION DAYS
2013-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-1 39732.0 102.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2014-2 33219.0 179.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-02 2075.3 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-01 93.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2015-03 5623.3 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For data sources see[1]

Waste Data

PERIOD TYPE QUANTITY UNITS DISPOSAL METHOD WASTE FACILITY PERMIT ID WASTE FACILITY NAME FACILITY CITY FACILITY STATE
2014-1 DRILLING FLUID WASTE 600.0 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NW006 CAES WATER TRMT & RECYCLING FAC CLARION PA
2014-1 FRACING FLUID WASTE 1.0 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123NW006 CAES WATER TRMT & RECYCLING FAC CLARION PA
2014-2 PRODUCED FLUID 120.0 Bbl RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) WMGR123SW005 RESERVED ENV SVC HEMPFIELD TWP RESIDUAL WASTE OPER PA

For data sources see[2]

Inspection Data

INSPECTION ID DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VIOLATION ID VIOLATION CODE VIOLATION_COMMENT
2204188 2013-09-13 No Violations Noted Site inspection performed as part of an OG-57 waiver application review. E&S plan as compiled should effectively minimize accelerated erosion and sedimentation, provided the controls are implemented and miantained properly. It was noted that drill cuttings are to be disposed of by encapsulation in the drill pit. Contact was made with the Operator by the Department and it was confirmed that during site construction a qualified professional will be onsite to document the soil conditions to insure the bottom of the drill pit is more than 20 inches above the seasonal high groundwater table to insure complaince with Chapter 78.56 and Chapter 78.62. The verification will then be forwarded to the Department as an amendment to the aproved E&S plan. Should the field verification show that the drill cuttings are not able to be encapsualted the operator will forward the appropriate change to the E&S plan detailing the chosen method of drill cutting disposal.
2224478 2013-11-25 No Violations Noted Site construction was underway at the time of the inspection. Perimeter E&S controls had been installed at the time of the inspection. There was no accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. The E&S plan as compiled should effectively minimize accelerated erosion or sedimentation provided the remaining erosion controls are implemented and maintained as outlined in the E&S plan.
2227343 2013-12-05 No Violations Noted Installing surface casing; waiting on cementing service company
2231744 2013-12-23 No Violations Noted Drilling appeared to have been completed at the time of the inspection. Drill pit located onsite and it contained drill cuttings and fluids. Access road and site erosion controls ahd functioned properly and there was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road.
2248993 2014-02-26 No Violations Noted Well appeared to be equipped for production. Brine tanks located onsite and they appeared to be in sound condition. Drill pit located onsite and it was noted as frozen. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road.
2333360 2015-01-05 No Violations Noted Well appeared to be equipped for production. Brine tanks located onsite and they appeared to be in sound condition. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the access road. As per an agreement between ther operator and landowner the site had been regraded and turned over to the landowner for continued agricultural activity.

For data sources see[3]

References