X

Track changes made to this page

If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.



Privacy policy
Close this window

powered by ChangeDetection

34-031-22869

Well Details

Well ID: 34-031-22869
Loading map...
Country: United States
State: Ohio
County: Coshocton
Municipality: Monroe Township
Operator Name: JAMES WRAY INC
Well Pad ID:
Farm/Lease Name: ROOT ENICE E
License Status: Producing
License Date: 1976-09-13
Spud Date: 1976-12-01
Spud Drilling Contractor:
Final Drill Date: 1976-12-10
Well Total Depth: 3717.00 ft
Configuration: Vertical
Latitude: 40.430000
Longitude: -82.030000

For data sources see[1]

Well History

Well Status Well Status Date Comment
CO 1976-09-13 982 CONPETRO INC GeoDate 9/13/76
Completed 1976-12-10 CH IN TOOL 10-20-76
Original Spud 1976-12-10 CH IN TOOL 10-20-76
Reached Total Depth 1976-12-10 CH IN TOOL 10-20-76
Change of Owner 2006-05-09 Operator changed from 982, CONPETRO INC to 672, WRAY JAMES INC (WRAY ACTUALLY HAD THIS WELL SINCE 1984 - NO CHANGE OF OWNER ON FILE).
Record Last Modified 2013-10-03 CH IN TOOL 10-20-76

For data sources see[2]

Perforation Treatments

Perforation Date Interval Top (ft) Interval Base (ft) Number of Shots
2006-09-11 3550 3553 3
2006-09-11 3540 3542 3
3515 3519 4
3515 3519 4
2006-09-11 3515 3519 4
2006-09-11 3629 3633 3
2006-09-11 3580 3582 3
2006-09-11 3563 3565 3

For data sources see[3]

Stimulations Data

Stimulation Date Chemical Agent Chemical Agent Concentration (%) Fracking Fluid Volume Mass of Proppant Used (lb) Fracking Company Comments
H2O 0 1800 Bbl 52000

For data sources see[4]

Production Data

Period Operator Name Gas Quantity (mcf) Oil Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 584.00 0
1985 OXFORD OIL 0.00 932.00 365
1986 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 633.00 180
1989 SENECA ENERGY CORP 1328.00 0.00 365
1990 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 331.00 190
1991 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 310.00 150
1992 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 352.00 200
1993 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 348.00 365
1994 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 307.00 365
1995 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 191.00 365
1996 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 273.00 365
1997 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 271.00 295
1998 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 147.00 210
1999 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 193.00 365
2000 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 231.00 365
2001 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 98.00 365
2002 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 263.00 365
2003 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 227.00 365
2006 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 229.00 365
2007 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 220.00 365
2008 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 150.00 365
2009 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 151.00 365
2010 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 150.00 365
2011 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 114.00 365
2012 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 108.00 366
2013 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 74.00 365
2014 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 67.00 365
2015 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 73.00 365
2016 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 70.00 365
2017 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 0.00 365
2018 JAMES WRAY INC 0.00 0.00 365

For data sources see[5] [6]

Waste Data

Period Operator Name Waste Type Quantity (bbl) Production Days
1984 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 0
1985 OXFORD OIL Brine 0 365
1986 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 15 180
1989 SENECA ENERGY CORP Brine 0 365
1990 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 10 190
1991 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 150
1992 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 200
1993 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
1994 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 35 365
1995 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 365
1996 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 365
1997 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 20 295
1998 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 210
1999 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 12 365
2000 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 365
2001 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2002 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2003 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 365
2006 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2007 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2008 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2009 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2010 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2011 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 25 365
2012 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 366
2013 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 13 365
2014 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 23 365
2015 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2016 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 70 365
2017 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 0 365
2018 JAMES WRAY INC Brine 75 365

For data sources see[7] [8]

Inspection Data

Inspections Performed

Inspection ID Inspection Date Inspection Type Inspection Result Inspection Comments
-1565858609 2010-6-30 0:00: PW No Violations
-1865125244 2010-7-9 0:00:0 PW No Violations
-586186165 2017-9-11 0:00: PW No Violations 1.00
0292629973 2017-08-10 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I met with Rick Wray at the production equipment site. We walked the site and we went over the compliance issues. Rick and I discussed the actions needed to remediate the site and a timeline for completing the work.
0586186165 2017-09-11 Production Wells No Violations On the day of my inspection I found that all brine impacted soil had been removed from inside the dike, down the slope across the lease road, and down the hillside on the other side of the lease road. The lease road had been reworked with new water breaks. The dike wall had been repaired and built up to allow for containment of fluids. Correct, legible identification had been posted in a conspicuous place at the wellhead and production equipment. The compliance notice is resolved.
0860039297 2005-05-19 Production Wells No Violations Well in production .
1502288158 2017-08-09 Production Wells Violations Noted On the day of my inspection I found that the well was equipped with an electric powered pumping unit. The motor, drive belts and electric were intact. The flow line was connected and the tubing valve was open. The gauge showed 0 psi. There were no leaks at the wellhead. When I was driving up to the production equipment site I noticed a wash running down hill from the tanks, across the lease road an into the forest on the other side. The wash was full of black leaf litter. I handled some of the leaves and they didnt feel viscous or have a hydrocarbon odor. I followed the wash up to the tanks and found that it originated from a low spot in the southwest corner of the dike. There was one 100 barrel steel tank and two 20 barrel poly tanks in the dike. They all appeared to be in good condition and there were no signs of being run over. The dike was partially filled with fluid and black leaf litter. There were also heavy deer tracks around the inner perimeter. I tested the standing water in the dike with a high range Quantab for chlorides and found the level to be at 2121 ppm(mg/L) or 0.350 %NaCl. The production equipment is shared by permits 2869 and 4281. There was no identification posted anywhere on or near the tanks, and there was no identification at the wellhead. The actions needed to bring this well into compliance are: 1) remove all brine impacted soil from inside the dike, down the slope across the lease road, and down the hillside on the other side of the lease road. 2) repair the dike wall to allow for containment of fluids. 3) post legible identification in a conspicuous place at the wellhead and production equipment.
1565858609 2010-06-30 Production Wells No Violations MEET WITH PUMPER , WORKING ON CLEANING OIL FROM WELL HEAD AREA .
1865125244 2010-07-09 Production Wells No Violations Complaint from Jay with North region . Said he had a call from someone riding a 4 wheeler on property and seen oil around well head . I was notified by Ronnie ringwalt of spill prior to complaint . Site has been cleaned up and is in compliance .
292629973 2017-8-10 0:00: PW No Violations 2.00
860039297 2005-5-19 0:00: PW No Violations

Violations Commited

Inspection ID Violation ID Violation Date Violation Code Violation Comments
1502288158 US-OH-114137 2017-09-19 Well operation causing pollution and contamination
1502288158 US-OH-114138 2017-09-19 Failure to legibly identify well
1502288158 US-OH-114139 2017-09-19 Dike or pit not able to prevent escape of brine or other wastes

For data sources see[9]

References