If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-005-30876 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.803517,"lon":-79.556114,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Armstrong | |
Municipality: North Buffalo Township | |
Operator Name: MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | |
Well Pad ID: 147040 | |
Farm/Lease Name: MDS ENERGY 1M | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2011-09-01 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Vertical Well | |
Conservation: Yes | |
Latitude: 40.803517 | |
Longitude: -79.556114 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2011-09-01 | New Permit Application |
2012-04-10 | Performed Spud Operation |
2012-09-05 | Drilling Completion |
2012-09-25 | Perforation |
2013-05-15 | NEWLY DRILLED |
For data sources see[4]
Job Number | Job Start Date | Job End Date | True Vertical Depth (ft) | Total Water Volume (gal) | Total Non-Water Volume (gal) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2012-09-25 | 2012-09-25 | 7,010 | 167,568 |
Job Number | Trade Name | Supplier | Purpose | Ingredient Name | CAS Number | Additive Percentage by Mass | Job Percentage by Mass | Mass Used (lb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bbbbb | bbbbb | Proprietary | 7.00 | 0.00002000 | |||
Diethylene glycol | 111-46-6 | 3.50 | 0.00020000 | |||||
Ethylene glycol | 107-21-1 | 1.00 | 0.00006000 | |||||
Propargyl alcohol | 107-19-7 | 30.00 | 0.00009000 | |||||
Polyethylene glycol | 25322-68-3 | 50.00 | 0.00283000 | |||||
Anionic Copolymer (proprietary) | ||||||||
Ethoxylated C12-16 alcohols | 68551-12-2 | 4.00 | 0.00369000 | |||||
Isopropanol | 67-63-0 | 30.00 | 0.00009000 | |||||
1,2,4-Butanetricarboxylic acid, 2-phosphono- | 37971-36-1 | |||||||
1,2-Propylene glycol | 57-55-6 | 25.00 | 0.02 | |||||
Acid Inhibitor-2 | Acid Corrosion Inhibitor | |||||||
Hydrochloric Acid 7.5 | Bulk Acid | Hydrochloric acid | 7647-01-0 | 7.50 | 0.01 | |||
Super TSC | Scale Control | 1,2-Propylene glycol | 57-55-6 | 50.00 | 0.00257000 | |||
KR-153SL | Biocide | 2,2-Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide | 10222-01-2 | 20.00 | 0.00113000 | |||
WFR-3B | bbbbb | Stoddard solvent | 8052-41-3 | 10.00 | 0.00922000 | |||
Distillates, petroleum, hydrotreated light | 64742-47-8 | 30.00 | 0.02 | |||||
Nitrogen | Stimulant Fluid | Nitrogen, liquid | 7727-37-9 | 100.00 | 28.32 | |||
Acid Inhibitor-2 | Nabors Industries | Acid Corrosion Inhibitor | ||||||
2-Butoxyethanol | 111-76-2 | 30.00 | 0.00090000 | |||||
Super 100NE | Surfactant/Foamer | 2-Butoxyethanol | 111-76-2 | 7.00 | 0.00990000 | |||
Isopropanol | 67-63-0 | 30.00 | 0.04 | |||||
Hydrochloric Acid 12.5-18 | Bulk Acid | Hydrochloric acid | 7647-01-0 | 18.00 | 0.02 | |||
WFR-3B | Friction Reducer | |||||||
ICP-1000 | Low Freeze Point Dispersant | 1,2-Propylene glycol | 57-55-6 | 50.00 | 0.00543000 | |||
Anionic Copolymer (proprietary) | 50.00 | 0.00543000 | ||||||
Sand | Proppant | Quartz | 14808-60-7 | 99.90 | 19.01 |
For data sources see[5]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | MDS ENERGY LTD | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | 19,226.00 | 60 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2013 | MDS ENERGY LTD | 37,298.00 | 358 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2014 | MDS ENERGY LTD | 21,775.00 | 361 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2015 | MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | 13,886.00 | 355 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2016 | MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | 11,986.00 | 339 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2017 | MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | 13,137.00 | 354 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2018 | MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | 11,454.00 | 348 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
2019 | MDS ENERGY DEV LLC | 9,732.00 | 358 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 320.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-21447 |
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Drilling Fluid Waste | 360.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | EPA ID: 748-163 |
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 80.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-23795 |
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Fracing Fluid Waste | 2,690.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | EPA ID: 748-163 |
2012 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 163.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-21893 |
2013 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 92.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-23223 |
2013 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 160.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-21438 |
2013 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 92.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-155-23732 |
2015 | MDS ENERGY LTD | Produced Fluid | 120.00 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROC FAC (GENERAL PERMIT) | WMGR123SW005 |
For data sources see[7]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2058536 | Primary Facility | 2012-04-09 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | The site was being constructed at the time of inspection. No accelerated erosion noted on the well pad or access road. The E&S plan was on site and being implemented at the time of inspection. The Department notes that a wetland of unknown size is located adjacent to the access road. The Department request the Operator delineate the wetland and submit the delineation document to the Department no later than 04/27/2012. The Department request the Operator line with clean durable limestone the drainage ditch and outflow area to ensure sediment is not transported off-site. |
2068966 | Primary Facility | 2012-05-11 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | Well spud in. Inspection conducted w/OGI J. Branan. |
2100953 | Primary Facility | 2012-09-19 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | At the time of inspection the well appeared to dilled but not equipped for production. The site appears to be in sound condition. No observation of accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the well pad or access road. All BMPs were installed properly and maintained as outlined in the E&S plan. The drill pit located onsite appeared to be in sound condition with the required 2 feet of freeboard. The Department suggests the Operator continue to monitor the site weekly and after significant precipitation event to ensure the integrity of the site is maintained. |
2137461 | Primary Facility | 2013-02-05 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Site was snow-covered at time of inspection. Site appeared to be equipped for production. Production equipment and brine tanks appeared to be in good condition. No leaks or erosion issues were detected. |
2249013 | Primary Facility | 2014-02-27 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Well appeared to be equipped for production. Brine tanks located onsite and they appeared to be in sound condition. Site had been effectively restored and the vegetative cover met the 70% uniform coverage criteria. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. |
2516145 | Primary Facility | 2016-09-02 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Well appeared to be equipped for production. Brine tanks located onsite and it appeared to be in sound condition. There was no observed accelerated erosion or sedimentation in relation to the site or access road. |
For data sources see[8]