If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
| Well ID: 37-059-25283 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":39.978582,"lon":-80.093881,"icon":""}]} |
| Country: United States | |
| State: Pennsylvania | |
| County: Greene | |
| Municipality: Morgan Township | |
| Operator Name: EQT PROD CO | |
| Well Pad ID: 151352 | |
| Farm/Lease Name: HILDEBRAND 590219 | |
| License Status: | |
| Spud Date: | |
| Permit Date: 2009-08-07 | |
| Well Type: GAS | |
| Unconventional Well: Y | |
| Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
| Conservation: Yes | |
| Latitude: 39.978582 | |
| Longitude: -80.093881 |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2009-08-07 | New Permit Application |
| 2009-12-26 | Performed Spud Operation |
| 2010-01-23 | Drilling Completion |
| 2010-04-01 | Perforation |
| 2010-04-01 | Performed Stimulation |
| 2010-04-13 | DEVIATED |
For data sources see[4]
| Stimulation Date | Phase Number | Chemical Agent | Volume (gal) | Treating Pressure (psi) | Breakdown Pressure (psi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For data sources see[5]
| Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | EQT PROD CO | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | 845,871.00 | 157 | 0.00 | 157 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | 1,086,485.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 181 | 0.00 | 181 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | 808,337.00 | 366 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2013 | EQT PROD CO | 605,332.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2014 | EQT PROD CO | 434,030.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2015 | EQT PROD CO | 430,933.00 | 357 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2016 | EQT PROD CO | 320,895.00 | 364 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2017 | EQT PROD CO | 262,789.00 | 365 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2018 | EQT PROD CO | 211,230.00 | 344 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 2019 | EQT PROD CO | 156,617.00 | 357 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[6]
| Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 0.00 Bbl | IDENTIFY METHOD IN COMMENTS | |
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 333.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-167-28466 |
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 2,505.00 Bbl | IDENTIFY METHOD IN COMMENTS | 34-167-29359 |
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 283.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-121-24037 |
| 2010 | EQT PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 5.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-167-28466 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 233.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-121-24037 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 113.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-059-24067 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 1,046.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-167-28466 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 341.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 959.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 303.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-009-21899 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 17,976.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 100.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-083-24137 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 7,800.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | WMGR123SW001 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 486.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-117-23388 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 112.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 34-059-24067 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 238.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | WMGR123SW001 |
| 2011 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 110.00 Bbl | CENTRALIZED TREATMENT PLANT FOR RECYCLE | 301353 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 1,900.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 114.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-167-28462 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 114.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 2D0855151 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 542.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-083-24137 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 2,024.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 332.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-167-28466 |
| 2012 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 172.00 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-117-23388 |
| 2013 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 9,985.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2013 | EQT PROD CO | Drilling Fluid Waste | 1,300.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2014 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 4,027.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2014 | EQT PROD CO | Fracturing Fluid Waste | 22.00 Tons | LANDFILL | SWF 1032-WV0109 |
| 2015 | EQT PROD CO | Fracing Fluid Waste | 217.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2015 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 4,277.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2016 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 1,441.00 Bbl | REUSE OTHER THAN ROAD SPREADING | |
| 2017 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 12.47 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-157-25511 |
| 2017 | EQT PROD CO | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 10.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2017 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 947.58 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 37.44 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW005 |
| 2018 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 2.75 Bbl | REUSE AT A WELL PAD OUTSIDE PENNSYLVANIA | |
| 2018 | EQT PROD CO | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 47.13 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2018 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 142.94 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2019 | EQT PROD CO | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 68.57 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2019 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 233.22 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
| 2019 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 15.27 Bbl | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | WMGR123SW005 |
| 2019 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 15.69 Bbl | INJECTION DISPOSAL WELL | 34-009-23823 |
For data sources see[7]
| Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840882 | Primary Facility | 2009-10-29 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 1850970 | Primary Facility | 2009-11-24 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 1866811 | Primary Facility | 2010-02-24 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | HORIZONTAL MARCELLUS |
| 1877854 | Primary Facility | 2010-04-06 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | HORIZONTAL MARCELLUS |
| 1878379 | Primary Facility | 2010-01-29 | Drilling/Alteration | No Violations Noted | HORIZONTAL MARCELLUS |
| 2083845 | Primary Facility | 2012-07-12 | Complaint Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2120292 | Primary Facility | 2012-11-06 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | Sampled Hildebrand's Spring. Soil Pile from sediment trap still covered and on site. Impoundment still on site with liner that appeared to have been patched. |
| 2123055 | Primary Facility | 2012-06-18 | Complaint Inspection | No Violations Noted | Water Well Complaint - No Land Owners at residence. Water well is connected to water to fresh water tank and could not sanmple |
| 2152268 | Primary Facility | 2013-03-14 | Complaint Inspection | No Violations Noted | The Department was at the above referenced Marcellus Wells to conduct a follow-up Complaint Inspection. The Department sampled the spring in the cattle field next to the access road. The sample results have not all been reported at this point. Sample results will be provided to all parties involved. The soil pile from the sediment trap is still on site and covered with plastic. |
| 2595653 | Primary Facility | 2017-04-05 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 04/05/17 at approximately 1200 hours I along with WQSS John Carson and Environmental Engineer Donna Davis conducted a follow up inspection of the Hildebrand site in response to an NOV issued on 03/07/17.
The leak around the riser structure in the rain garden had been repaired. The rain garden appears to contain sediment from poorly stabilized adjacent slopes. The slopes appeared to be failing, depositing sediment into the rain garden and causing a loss of volume. Additionally, erosion was occurring along the southwestern rip rap channel into the rain garden. It is recommended that this be repaired to prevent further erosion and volume loss. It is requested that EQT contact Donna Davis to discuss maintenance of the BMP. It is requested that EQT contact Donna Davis regarding the cross drain causing erosion into the pond on UNT to Castile Run. The silt socks that were previously undercut or overtopped had been maintained to prevent undercutting, but sediment was still close to or at the top of the silt soc |
| 2613960 | Primary Facility | 2017-06-27 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | A follow up inspection was conducted, since previously cited violations are still outstanding. An excavator was present on the site making repairs to the rain garden. The erosion that had occurred in the area of the removed sediment trap appeared to have been repaired, but erosion was still occurring in the area. Silt socks had been reconfigured to prevent further erosion. Portions of the area upslope of the removed sediment trap had increased vegetative cover since the last NOV was issued. The access road appeared to be washing out on the bend in the access road. The slide in the well pad slope was still present. Additional repairs on the site appeared to be occurring at the time of inspection. |
| 2638128 | Primary Facility | 2017-09-20 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | A site inspection was conducted in response to EQT requesting a meeting to discuss site vegetation and silt sock removal. The Act 9 sign was in place and all required documents were present at the site. The site overall was well vegetated. The erosion channel from near the access road to the location of the removed sediment trap was vegetated. It is recommended that the erosion channel be repaired to original grade, seeded, and mulched. The rain garden appeared to be in good condition. The production equipment appeared to be in good condition. There were no violations observed at the time of inspection. |
| 2692678 | Primary Facility | 2018-01-29 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | The Act 9 sign was in place and all required documents were present at the site. The site entrance exhibited signs of access road erosion (see photographs). It appeared water was overflowing the culvert and removing material from the access road near the Act 9 sign.
The site did not exhibit uniform 70% vegetative cover. Areas of poor or no vegetative cover were observed. Erosion was occurring along the access road below the check dams in the location of the removed sediment trap (see photographs). The site does not meet the requirements for permit termination. The NOT is denied. |
| 2760132 | Primary Facility | 2018-07-19 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | A site restoration inspection was conducted in response to an NOT submittal from EQT Production Co. The Act 9 sign was in place and all required documents were present.
Erosion of the access road was observed at the site entrance. Metal grates were in place over a large channel in the access road (see photographs). The channel continued off the site parallel to Bowser Road heading South. Erosion of the access road along the right side was also observed (see photographs). Erosion was observed adjacent to the left side of the access road below a neighboring pond, exposing a black pipe. Poorly vegetated soil and accelerated erosion were observed where silt sock was removed in the area of the restored sediment trap. Multiple small erosion rills were observed in the vegetated area upslope. It appeared the rills existed and were not repaired prior to the vegetation grew and covered the rills. It is recommended the accelerated erosion is repaired. The site does not meet the requirements for permit terminatio |
| 2798836 | Primary Facility | 2018-11-06 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | |
| 2809657 | Primary Facility | 2018-11-14 | Site Restoration | No Violations Noted | A meeting was requested by EQT to evaluate the site for NOT criteria. The Act 9 sign was in place and all required documents were present at the site. PCSM was installed and appeared to be functioning. Site vegetation met the requirement of 70% uniform vegetative cover. The site meets the requirements for permit termination. The NOT is approved. |
| 2849624 | Primary Facility | 2019-02-25 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 02/25/19 at approximately 1220 hours I conducted an inspection of the site. It appeared recent heavy rains had caused the pit collecting water for the culvert to overflow at the site entrance, causing wash out of the access road. Ice was present on Bowser road and appeared to have been caused by water leaving the well site.
Water from the adjacent private pond was eroding through the pond bank along the pipe leading to the culvert inlet. The inlet from the pond was clogged with debris, causing water to divert around the pipe and erode alongside it. The culvert appeared to be functioning at the time of inspection. |
For data sources see[8]