If you find this page useful and would like to be notified of changes made to this page, start by inputting your email below.
powered by ChangeDetection
Well ID: 37-125-27821 | Loading map...
{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"100%","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"wmsoverlay":false,"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"markercluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","enablefullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":40.189261,"lon":-79.937478,"icon":""}]} |
Country: United States | |
State: Pennsylvania | |
County: Washington | |
Municipality: Carroll Township | |
Operator Name: EQT PROD CO | |
Well Pad ID: | |
Farm/Lease Name: WERNER 592703 | |
License Status: | |
Spud Date: | |
Permit Date: 2015-12-22 | |
Well Type: GAS | |
Unconventional Well: Y | |
Configuration: Horizontal Well | |
Conservation: No | |
Latitude: 40.189261 | |
Longitude: -79.937478 |
Date | Event |
---|---|
2015-12-22 | New Permit Application |
For data sources see[4]
Period | Operator Name | Gas Quantity (mcf) | Gas Production Days | Oil Quantity (bbl) | Oil Production Days | Water Quantity (bbl) | Water Production Days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | EQT PROD CO | 1,654,312.00 | 173 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
For data sources see[5]
Period | Operator | Waste Type | Quantity | Disposal Method | Waste Facility ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | EQT PROD CO | Synthetic Liner Materials | 4.48 Tons | LANDFILL | 100277 |
2017 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 770.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) | |
2017 | EQT PROD CO | Produced Fluid | 81.64 Tons | RESIDUAL WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY | 2014-541 |
2017 | EQT PROD CO | Other Oil & Gas Wastes | 55.00 Bbl | REUSE (AT WELL PAD) |
For data sources see[6]
Inspection ID | Inspection Category | Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Inspection Result | Inspection Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2487877 | Primary Facility | 2016-01-08 | Routine/Partial Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 1/8/16, I performed a routine partial inspection at the Bernard Werner Site in response to an operator request to review the site in relation to an upcoming pre-op for a major modification/expansion and made the following observations:
•The site was in generally good condition and no earthwork had begun at the time of inspection. •Three active wells were on the site at the time of inspection, five further wells were permitted for the expanded pad, and one well was proposed but never materialized. |
2489208 | Primary Facility | 2016-01-26 | Preoperation Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 1/26/2016, I performed a preoperation inspection at the Bernard Werner site in response to an operator request and made the following observations:
•Site perimeter controls were in place and functional. •Areas of exposed earth on site that were not being actively worked on were noted to have been temporarily stabilized. •An area near the corner of the impoundment may allow water to leave the LOD. It is recommended that the CFS be extended to meet the nearby culvert. This recommendation was accepted by the operator at the time of inspection and approved as a redline request. No violation. •A roadside ditch sloping towards the pad was not rock lined at the time of inspection, due to directionality being towards site it is being considered an intermediate (not perimeter control). Per the operator it is expected to be finished by the end of the day. No violation. •Multiple redline changes were requested and approved during the inspection including addition of CFS near the entrance and the addition of two |
2515192 | Primary Facility | 2016-05-24 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 5/24/16, I performed a follow up inspection at the Bernard Werner site monitoring issues noted on 1/26/16 (eFACTS ID: 2489198) and made the following observations:
•A moderately eroded ATV path extends from access road off site, reported to be land owner created. No violation. •The bank of the diversion channel on the up slope side of the access road was largely barren; no prominent erosion damage was noted. The diversion channel was otherwise completed and functional. No violation, remediation recommended. •The cut slope above the well pad was stabilized but was still very sparsely vegetated at the time of inspection. No violation. •The vertical shafts of 8 wells had been drilled on site and were awaiting further drilling at the time of inspection. •Additional bare or sparse patches of vegetation were found on the north side of the site access road near the well pad, one the cut slop between the well pad and the small accessory pad, and between the small pad and the impoundment. •Redline changes app |
2627997 | Primary Facility | 2017-08-22 | Routine/Complete Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 8/22/17 an RTNC inspection of the Bernard Werner well site was conducted. The following was observed:
>>The site appeared stable and in generally good condition. >>10 wells were observed at the time of inspection. >>A section of CFS was found near the impoundment in a well vegetated area that should either be maintained or removed. |
2666242 | Primary Facility | 2017-11-28 | Incident- Response to Accident or Event | No Violations Noted | On 11/28/17 an incident inspection of the Werner well site was conducted in response to a spill (CTS ID: 331105) reported on 11/23/17. The following was observed:
>>An area of disturbed earth near a juncture in the site access road was noted to be unstabilized at the time of inspection. No violation, remediation recommended. >>The exact location of the spill was unable to be determined, operator contacts with detailed information were not available at the time of inspection. No violation, further information needed for determination. |
2666577 | Primary Facility | 2017-12-01 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 12/1/17 an incident inspection of the Werner well site was conducted in response to a spill (CTS ID: 331105) reported on 11/23/17. The following was observed:
>>The initial report was of a truck rollover that resulted in an estimated spill of 20 gallons of oil to the roadside culvert. The spill was fully cleaned at the time of the initial inspection on 11/28/17 but the location of the spill was unable to be identified. Upon locating the site of the spill cleanup appears to be complete and without further impact. While this constitutes a violation of 25 Pa. Code 78.54 in the the operator failed to control fluids associated with well servicing it has been determined that the violation was immediately corrected. >>The unstabilized disturbed area noted on 11/28/17 remained unstabilized at the time of inspection. Continued failure to provide temporary stabilization would constitute a violation under 25 Pa. Code 102.22(b)(1). |
2667071 | Primary Facility | 2017-12-04 | Follow-up Inspection | No Violations Noted | On 12/4/17 an FUI inspection was conducted in response to concerns noted during a prior inspection on 12/1/17. The following was noted:
>>The unstabilized area of the site noted during a prior inspection on 12/1/17 had been stabilized at the time of inspection. No violation. >>A small area between a section of CFS near the road juncture and the drainage channel was not stabilized. CFS at this location was also noted to be damaged. Remediation is recommended, no violation. |
2686034 | Primary Facility | 2018-01-23 | Administrative/File Review | No Violations Noted | On 1/23/18 an administrative inspection related to the Werner Well site was conducted in response to a complaint (CTS ID: 325462). The operator reported the complainant's concerns of potential pollution of a spring used as a partial water supply. Direct contact with the complainant found that the water had a history of methane contamination but no new or ongoing evidence of contamination. Further investigation by the DEP was declined at this time. |
For data sources see[7]